TY - JOUR
T1 - Usefulness of Semiautomated 3D Volumetric Assessment of Liver Tumor Burden for Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor
T2 - A Pilot Study
AU - Fujimori, Nao
AU - Fujita, Nobuhiro
AU - Murakami, Masatoshi
AU - Ohno, Akihisa
AU - Matsumoto, Kazuhide
AU - Teramatsu, Katsuhito
AU - Ueda, Keijiro
AU - Wada, Noriaki
AU - Takao, Seiichiro
AU - Okamoto, Daisuke
AU - Ishigami, Kousei
AU - Ito, Tetsuhide
AU - Ogawa, Yoshihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Objectives In patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), the Ki-67 index is objectively assessed by pathologists; however, liver tumor burden (LTB) depends on the subjective judgment of physicians. This study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the semi-automated 3D volumetric assessment of LTB in patients with PanNET. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (40 computed tomographies [CTs]) with metastatic PanNETs. LTB was measured using a semiautomated 3D volumetric software program (volumetric assessment) or evaluated independently by 6 clinicians using CT imaging (visual assessment). The treatment map was classified into 3 groups based on LTB and Ki-67 index. Results Visual and volumetric assessments of the LTB were well correlated. The LTB was significantly higher on visual assessment than volumetric assessment (P < 0.01). Categorization on the map was consistent between the visual and volumetric evaluations in 23 patients (equal group). The remaining 6 patients were overestimated by visual assessment (overestimated group). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients in the 'equal group' than the 'overestimated group' (981 vs 366 days, P < 0.01). Conclusions This pilot study revealed a good correlation between visual and volumetric assessments, and visual assessment overestimated LTB, compared to volumetric assessment.
AB - Objectives In patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), the Ki-67 index is objectively assessed by pathologists; however, liver tumor burden (LTB) depends on the subjective judgment of physicians. This study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the semi-automated 3D volumetric assessment of LTB in patients with PanNET. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients (40 computed tomographies [CTs]) with metastatic PanNETs. LTB was measured using a semiautomated 3D volumetric software program (volumetric assessment) or evaluated independently by 6 clinicians using CT imaging (visual assessment). The treatment map was classified into 3 groups based on LTB and Ki-67 index. Results Visual and volumetric assessments of the LTB were well correlated. The LTB was significantly higher on visual assessment than volumetric assessment (P < 0.01). Categorization on the map was consistent between the visual and volumetric evaluations in 23 patients (equal group). The remaining 6 patients were overestimated by visual assessment (overestimated group). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients in the 'equal group' than the 'overestimated group' (981 vs 366 days, P < 0.01). Conclusions This pilot study revealed a good correlation between visual and volumetric assessments, and visual assessment overestimated LTB, compared to volumetric assessment.
KW - Ki-67 index
KW - liver tumor burden
KW - pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
KW - semi-automated volumetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217677239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85217677239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002413
DO - 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002413
M3 - Article
C2 - 39928889
AN - SCOPUS:85217677239
SN - 0885-3177
VL - 54
SP - e122-e129
JO - Pancreas
JF - Pancreas
IS - 2
ER -