TY - JOUR
T1 - Trueness of the Combined Intra and Extraoral Scanning Technique for Transferring Subgingival Contours from Provisional Restorations to Definitive Restorations
AU - Sanda, Koma
AU - Yasunami, Noriyuki
AU - Matsushita, Yasuyuki
AU - Furuhashi, Akihiro
AU - Matsuzaki, Tatsuya
AU - Imai, Mikio
AU - Cheng, Chi Hsiang
AU - Koyano, Kiyoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: To compare the morphologic trueness of provisional and definitive restorations constructed with conventional custom impression techniques to those constructed with intra and extraoral scanning (IEOS), which can digitally transfer the subgingival morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Materials and Methods: Provisional restorations were fabricated on typodonts in which implants were placed. In the conventional method, a customized impression coping was produced by using polymethyl methacrylate resin to transfer the subgingival contour of the provisional restoration. Impressions were taken with silicone impression material, and definitive restorations were made by CAM. The IEOS technique was performed as previously reported. In brief, three individually scanned stereolithography (STL) files were superimposed in CAD software to transfer the morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Definitive restorations were then made by CAM. The provisional and definitive restorations were both scanned by IOS. Scanned data files were superimposed with morphometry software, and the distortions were measured. Student t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The subgingival morphologies of definitive restorations prepared by the conventional method showed significant negative distortions compared to definitive restorations prepared by the IEOS technique. Conclusion: The IEOS technique can more accurately transfer the subgingival contour of provisional restorations to definitive restorations compared to the conventional customized impression coping technique.
AB - Purpose: To compare the morphologic trueness of provisional and definitive restorations constructed with conventional custom impression techniques to those constructed with intra and extraoral scanning (IEOS), which can digitally transfer the subgingival morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Materials and Methods: Provisional restorations were fabricated on typodonts in which implants were placed. In the conventional method, a customized impression coping was produced by using polymethyl methacrylate resin to transfer the subgingival contour of the provisional restoration. Impressions were taken with silicone impression material, and definitive restorations were made by CAM. The IEOS technique was performed as previously reported. In brief, three individually scanned stereolithography (STL) files were superimposed in CAD software to transfer the morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Definitive restorations were then made by CAM. The provisional and definitive restorations were both scanned by IOS. Scanned data files were superimposed with morphometry software, and the distortions were measured. Student t test was used for statistical analysis. Results: The subgingival morphologies of definitive restorations prepared by the conventional method showed significant negative distortions compared to definitive restorations prepared by the IEOS technique. Conclusion: The IEOS technique can more accurately transfer the subgingival contour of provisional restorations to definitive restorations compared to the conventional customized impression coping technique.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164233286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164233286&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11607/ijp.7030
DO - 10.11607/ijp.7030
M3 - Article
C2 - 36484679
AN - SCOPUS:85164233286
SN - 0893-2174
VL - 36
SP - 308
EP - 314
JO - International Journal of Prosthodontics
JF - International Journal of Prosthodontics
IS - 3
ER -