TY - JOUR
T1 - The validity of the surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas advocated by the 2017 revised International Association of Pancreatology consensus guidelines
AU - Watanabe, Yusuke
AU - Endo, Sho
AU - Nishihara, Kazuyoshi
AU - Ueda, Keijiro
AU - Mine, Mari
AU - Tamiya, Sadafumi
AU - Nakano, Toru
AU - Tanaka, Masao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) advocated by the 2017 revised International Association of Pancreatology consensus guidelines (IAPCG2017). Methods: The medical records of 63 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for IPMN were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Thirteen patients had main-duct IPMN, 25 had mixed IPMN, and 25 had branch-duct IPMN with frequencies of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma of 62, 24, and 28%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of high-risk stigmata for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma advocated by the IAPCG2017 were 90 and 67%, respectively. Of 17 patients with invasive carcinoma, all patients had high-risk stigmata, and 16 had an enhanced mural nodule (MN) of ≥ 5 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of a ≥ 5-mm enhanced MN for predicting invasive carcinoma were 94% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Introducing a size threshold for enhanced MNs into the assessment of high-risk stigmata increases the specificity without jeopardizing the sensitivity. The surgical indication for any type of IPMN may be determined using only a ≥ 5-mm enhanced MN. When the type of IPMN is classified strictly, about half of IPMNs are mixed type, and most are benign. The surgical indication for mixed IPMN should be reconsidered.
AB - Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indication for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) advocated by the 2017 revised International Association of Pancreatology consensus guidelines (IAPCG2017). Methods: The medical records of 63 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for IPMN were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Thirteen patients had main-duct IPMN, 25 had mixed IPMN, and 25 had branch-duct IPMN with frequencies of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma of 62, 24, and 28%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of high-risk stigmata for high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma advocated by the IAPCG2017 were 90 and 67%, respectively. Of 17 patients with invasive carcinoma, all patients had high-risk stigmata, and 16 had an enhanced mural nodule (MN) of ≥ 5 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of a ≥ 5-mm enhanced MN for predicting invasive carcinoma were 94% and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Introducing a size threshold for enhanced MNs into the assessment of high-risk stigmata increases the specificity without jeopardizing the sensitivity. The surgical indication for any type of IPMN may be determined using only a ≥ 5-mm enhanced MN. When the type of IPMN is classified strictly, about half of IPMNs are mixed type, and most are benign. The surgical indication for mixed IPMN should be reconsidered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049193431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049193431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00595-018-1691-2
DO - 10.1007/s00595-018-1691-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 29961172
AN - SCOPUS:85049193431
SN - 0941-1291
VL - 48
SP - 1011
EP - 1019
JO - Surgery today
JF - Surgery today
IS - 11
ER -