TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of scanning pitch of nozzle for a cavitating jet during overlapping peening treatment
AU - Takakuwa, O.
AU - Soyama, H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellow 22.2438 .
PY - 2012/7/15
Y1 - 2012/7/15
N2 - The objective of this paper is to optimize the pitch at which the nozzle of a cavitating jet is scanned during peening. The evaluations of an effect of the pitch on overlapping treatment are done, firstly theoretically, by estimating the aggressive intensity of the jet based on a Gaussian distribution in order to uniformly and effectively treat the surface in applications such as cavitation peening and cleaning. Experimentally, cavitation peening was conducted with the nozzle scanned at various pitches. Striped patterns, due to the non-uniform treatment, were formed in aluminum when pitches of 6, 8, 10 or 12. mm were used, whereas with pitches of 2 and 4. mm the patterns were uniform. The compressive residual stress introduced into type 316L stainless steel by cavitation peening was approximately 380 and 400. MPa for pitches of 2 and 4. mm, respectively. From the viewpoint of not only the uniformity but also effective and efficient treatment, the optimum pitch for scanning was determined to be 4. mm, since this requires half the number of scans compared to 2. mm.
AB - The objective of this paper is to optimize the pitch at which the nozzle of a cavitating jet is scanned during peening. The evaluations of an effect of the pitch on overlapping treatment are done, firstly theoretically, by estimating the aggressive intensity of the jet based on a Gaussian distribution in order to uniformly and effectively treat the surface in applications such as cavitation peening and cleaning. Experimentally, cavitation peening was conducted with the nozzle scanned at various pitches. Striped patterns, due to the non-uniform treatment, were formed in aluminum when pitches of 6, 8, 10 or 12. mm were used, whereas with pitches of 2 and 4. mm the patterns were uniform. The compressive residual stress introduced into type 316L stainless steel by cavitation peening was approximately 380 and 400. MPa for pitches of 2 and 4. mm, respectively. From the viewpoint of not only the uniformity but also effective and efficient treatment, the optimum pitch for scanning was determined to be 4. mm, since this requires half the number of scans compared to 2. mm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863775321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863775321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.034
DO - 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84863775321
SN - 0257-8972
VL - 206
SP - 4756
EP - 4762
JO - Surface and Coatings Technology
JF - Surface and Coatings Technology
IS - 23
ER -