TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and utility of ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglion block for headaches and orofacial pain
T2 - a retrospective, single-center study of 10 patients
AU - Maeda, Aiko
AU - Chikama, Yoji
AU - Tanaka, Ryudo
AU - Tominaga, Masachika
AU - Shirozu, Kazuhiro
AU - Yamaura, Ken
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: Several new ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglia blocks (U-SCGBs) have been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional superior cervical ganglia blocks; however, their clinical utility and practicality have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and utility of a new method of U-SCGB. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent U-SCGB for the treatment of headaches and orofacial pain at a single center. U-SCGB was performed by injecting 2–3 mL of 1% mepivacaine posterior to the internal carotid artery, just above the bifurcation. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pain scores. Numerical data are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Results: The total number of U-SCGB procedures was 43. All procedures were accompanied by Horner’s sign. The numerical rating scale score for pain (possible scores, 0–10) was reduced predominantly from 7.0 ± 0.7 before treatment to 4.5 ± 0.7 at the follow-up (p = 0.014). Conclusion: U-SCGB was considered a clinically useful and accurate treatment for headaches and orofacial pain in this study.
AB - Background: Several new ultrasound-guided superior cervical ganglia blocks (U-SCGBs) have been proposed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional superior cervical ganglia blocks; however, their clinical utility and practicality have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and utility of a new method of U-SCGB. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent U-SCGB for the treatment of headaches and orofacial pain at a single center. U-SCGB was performed by injecting 2–3 mL of 1% mepivacaine posterior to the internal carotid artery, just above the bifurcation. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare pain scores. Numerical data are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Results: The total number of U-SCGB procedures was 43. All procedures were accompanied by Horner’s sign. The numerical rating scale score for pain (possible scores, 0–10) was reduced predominantly from 7.0 ± 0.7 before treatment to 4.5 ± 0.7 at the follow-up (p = 0.014). Conclusion: U-SCGB was considered a clinically useful and accurate treatment for headaches and orofacial pain in this study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85156194129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85156194129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40981-023-00613-z
DO - 10.1186/s40981-023-00613-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85156194129
SN - 2363-9024
VL - 9
JO - JA Clinical Reports
JF - JA Clinical Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 21
ER -