TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors that increase mortality after living donor liver transplantation
AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
AU - Shirabe, Ken
AU - Taketomi, Akinobu
AU - Uchiyama, Hideaki
AU - Harada, Noboru
AU - Ijichi, Hideki
AU - Yoshimatsu, Masanori
AU - Ikegami, Toru
AU - Soejima, Yuji
AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/1/15
Y1 - 2012/1/15
N2 - BACKGROUND.: Female liver to male recipient is a well-accepted risk factor for graft loss in cadaveric liver transplantation. However, gender matching is infeasible because of an insufficient number of available donors. No studies have been performed on the role of gender in the field of living donor liver transplantation. This report investigates the effect of gender mismatch on the outcome of living donor liver transplantation. METHODS.: A total of 335 patients and donors were classified into four groups according to the following gender combinations: male donor to male recipient group (n=104), male donor to female recipient group (n=120), female donor to male recipient (FM) group (n=59), and female donor to female recipient group (n=52). Patient and graft survival were compared among the groups. We performed a multivariable analysis to identify the factors associated with patient mortality. RESULTS.: The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates in the FM group were 80.6%, 66.8%, 61.8%, and 47.7%, respectively. The FM group showed significantly shorter patient survival compared with the other three groups. Independent risk factors for patient mortality were: FM group (P=0.006), pretransplant diabetes mellitus (P=0.001), and a model for end-stage liver disease score more than or equal to 20 (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS.: Male recipients of transplants from female donors, pretransplant diabetes mellitus, and a model for end-stage liver disease score more than or equal to 20 have poor survival rates.
AB - BACKGROUND.: Female liver to male recipient is a well-accepted risk factor for graft loss in cadaveric liver transplantation. However, gender matching is infeasible because of an insufficient number of available donors. No studies have been performed on the role of gender in the field of living donor liver transplantation. This report investigates the effect of gender mismatch on the outcome of living donor liver transplantation. METHODS.: A total of 335 patients and donors were classified into four groups according to the following gender combinations: male donor to male recipient group (n=104), male donor to female recipient group (n=120), female donor to male recipient (FM) group (n=59), and female donor to female recipient group (n=52). Patient and graft survival were compared among the groups. We performed a multivariable analysis to identify the factors associated with patient mortality. RESULTS.: The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates in the FM group were 80.6%, 66.8%, 61.8%, and 47.7%, respectively. The FM group showed significantly shorter patient survival compared with the other three groups. Independent risk factors for patient mortality were: FM group (P=0.006), pretransplant diabetes mellitus (P=0.001), and a model for end-stage liver disease score more than or equal to 20 (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS.: Male recipients of transplants from female donors, pretransplant diabetes mellitus, and a model for end-stage liver disease score more than or equal to 20 have poor survival rates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84555196595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84555196595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0b013e318238dacd
DO - 10.1097/TP.0b013e318238dacd
M3 - Article
C2 - 22203391
AN - SCOPUS:84555196595
SN - 0041-1337
VL - 93
SP - 93
EP - 98
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
IS - 1
ER -