TY - JOUR
T1 - Pattern of occlusal contacts in lateral positions
T2 - canine protection and group function validity in classifying guidance patterns.
AU - Ogawa, T.
AU - Ogimoto, T.
AU - Koyano, Kiyoshi
PY - 1998/1/1
Y1 - 1998/1/1
N2 - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The concept of canine protection and group function lack consistency in the definitions and examining methods, and a valid system for evaluating and classifying occlusal contact patterns has not been established. PURPOSE: This study assessed the use of canine protection and group function in classifying occlusal guidance in the natural dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Occlusal contacts of 86 young adults were examined with shim stock in regulated lateral positions, 0.5,1,2 and 3 mm from the maximum intercuspation. The patterns of occlusal contacts varying with the lateral position were described. RESULTS: Focusing on the working-side contact only, most contact patterns belonged to group function, and a few to canine protection. Focusing on both the working and nonworking side contacts, nearly half the contact patterns were those other than canine protection and group function and were classified into balanced occlusion. CONCLUSION: The validity of the classification system using canine protection and group function is questionable. A new classification system of occlusal guidance is desirable.
AB - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The concept of canine protection and group function lack consistency in the definitions and examining methods, and a valid system for evaluating and classifying occlusal contact patterns has not been established. PURPOSE: This study assessed the use of canine protection and group function in classifying occlusal guidance in the natural dentition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Occlusal contacts of 86 young adults were examined with shim stock in regulated lateral positions, 0.5,1,2 and 3 mm from the maximum intercuspation. The patterns of occlusal contacts varying with the lateral position were described. RESULTS: Focusing on the working-side contact only, most contact patterns belonged to group function, and a few to canine protection. Focusing on both the working and nonworking side contacts, nearly half the contact patterns were those other than canine protection and group function and were classified into balanced occlusion. CONCLUSION: The validity of the classification system using canine protection and group function is questionable. A new classification system of occlusal guidance is desirable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032113359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032113359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70093-9
DO - 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70093-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 9656180
AN - SCOPUS:0032113359
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 80
SP - 67
EP - 74
JO - The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
JF - The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
IS - 1
ER -