TY - JOUR
T1 - Living donor liver transplantation in small-for-size setting
AU - Ikegami, Toru
AU - Balci, Deniz
AU - Jung, Dong Hwan
AU - Kim, Jong Man
AU - Quintini, Cristiano
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IJS Publishing Group Ltd
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Small-for-Size Syndrome (SFSS) is one of the most feared complication of adult split liver and living donor liver transplantation. SFSS stems from a disproportionate/excessive portal vein flow relative to the volume of the implanted liver graft, and is currently one of the major practical limits to partial liver grafts’ transplantation. In the last few decades many graft inflow modulation (GIM) techniques have been proposed to curtail the portal vein flow, allowing for successful transplantation of small partial liver grafts. Graft inflow modulation techniques span from Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL), to Splenectomy, Porto-Systemic Shunts and the lately proposed Splenic Devascularization. A patient tailored approach balancing the risk of SFSS with GIM specific morbidity, is more important than identifying the ideal GIM technique. Here we summarize the most recently published data to provide general indications in the challenging preoperative choice of a GIM techniques.
AB - Small-for-Size Syndrome (SFSS) is one of the most feared complication of adult split liver and living donor liver transplantation. SFSS stems from a disproportionate/excessive portal vein flow relative to the volume of the implanted liver graft, and is currently one of the major practical limits to partial liver grafts’ transplantation. In the last few decades many graft inflow modulation (GIM) techniques have been proposed to curtail the portal vein flow, allowing for successful transplantation of small partial liver grafts. Graft inflow modulation techniques span from Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL), to Splenectomy, Porto-Systemic Shunts and the lately proposed Splenic Devascularization. A patient tailored approach balancing the risk of SFSS with GIM specific morbidity, is more important than identifying the ideal GIM technique. Here we summarize the most recently published data to provide general indications in the challenging preoperative choice of a GIM techniques.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088786324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088786324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32738547
AN - SCOPUS:85088786324
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 82
SP - 134
EP - 137
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
ER -