TY - JOUR
T1 - ESG metrics and social equity
T2 - Investigating commensurability
AU - Keeley, Alexander R.
AU - Chapman, Andrew John
AU - Yoshida, Kenichi
AU - Xie, Jun
AU - Imbulana, Janaki
AU - Takeda, Shutaro
AU - Managi, Shunsuke
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20H00648 and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (JPMEERF20201001) of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Keeley, Chapman, Yoshida, Xie, Imbulana, Takeda and Managi.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - During the past two decades, the world has seen exponential growth in the number of companies reporting environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data, and various ESG metrics have been proposed and are now in use. ESG metrics play a crucial role as an enabler of investment strategies that consider ESG factors, which are often referred to as “ESG investments”. The ESG metrics and investment market are evolving rapidly, as investors, corporations, and the public are giving more priority to the “S” in ESG, including social equity issues, such as diversity, income inequality, worker safety, systemic racism, and companies' broader role in society. In this critical, systematic review, utilizing in-depth assessments, we investigate and compare the approaches employed in major ESG metrics and studies, then, we shed light on the “S” aspect by reviewing existing approaches used to assess social equity to clarify commensurability with ESG. Through the systematic review, this paper confirms that ESG investments can be expected to provide stable and high returns especially over the long term. This paper also clarifies how elements considered in social equity studies are largely reflected in major ESG metrics.
AB - During the past two decades, the world has seen exponential growth in the number of companies reporting environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data, and various ESG metrics have been proposed and are now in use. ESG metrics play a crucial role as an enabler of investment strategies that consider ESG factors, which are often referred to as “ESG investments”. The ESG metrics and investment market are evolving rapidly, as investors, corporations, and the public are giving more priority to the “S” in ESG, including social equity issues, such as diversity, income inequality, worker safety, systemic racism, and companies' broader role in society. In this critical, systematic review, utilizing in-depth assessments, we investigate and compare the approaches employed in major ESG metrics and studies, then, we shed light on the “S” aspect by reviewing existing approaches used to assess social equity to clarify commensurability with ESG. Through the systematic review, this paper confirms that ESG investments can be expected to provide stable and high returns especially over the long term. This paper also clarifies how elements considered in social equity studies are largely reflected in major ESG metrics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138036645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138036645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/frsus.2022.920955
DO - 10.3389/frsus.2022.920955
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85138036645
SN - 2673-4524
VL - 3
JO - Frontiers in Sustainability
JF - Frontiers in Sustainability
M1 - 920955
ER -