TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of combined androgen blockade therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer stratified by tumor burden
AU - Japanese Urological Oncology Group (JUOG)
AU - Nagumo, Yoshiyuki
AU - Onozawa, Mizuki
AU - Kojima, Takahiro
AU - Terada, Naoki
AU - Shiota, Masaki
AU - Mitsuzuka, Koji
AU - Yasumoto, Hiroaki
AU - Matsumoto, Hiroaki
AU - Enokida, Hideki
AU - Sugiyama, Takayuki
AU - Kuroiwa, Kentaro
AU - Saito, Toshihiro
AU - Yokomizo, Akira
AU - Kohei, Naoki
AU - Tabata, Ken ichi
AU - Takahashi, Atsushi
AU - Sugimoto, Mikio
AU - Kitamura, Hiroshi
AU - Kamoto, Toshiyuki
AU - Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
AU - Shimazui, Toru
AU - Inoue, Takahiro
AU - Goto, Takayuki
AU - Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
AU - Tomida, Ryotaro
AU - Sakurai, Toshihiko
AU - Hashimoto, Kohei
AU - Kawamura, Sadafumi
AU - Teraoka, Shogo
AU - Sakamoto, Shinichi
AU - Kimura, Takahiro
AU - Kamiyama, Manabu
AU - Narita, Shintaro
AU - Tanaka, Nobumichi
AU - Kato, Takuma
AU - Kato, Masashi
AU - Osawa, Takahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the following investigators who also participated in this study: Toru Shimazui (Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital), Takahiro Inoue (Kyoto University), Takayuki Goto (Kyoto University), Yasuhiro Hashimoto (Hirosaki University), Ryotaro Tomida (Shikoku Cancer Center), Toshihiko Sakurai (Yamagata University), Kohei Hashimoto (Sapporo Medical University), Sadafumi Kawamura (Miyagi Cancer Center), Shogo Teraoka (Tottori University), Shinichi Sakamoto (Chiba University), Takahiro Kimura (Jikei University), Manabu Kamiyama (University of Yamanashi Hospital), Shintaro Narita (Akita University), Nobumichi Tanaka (Nara Medical University), Takuma Kato (Kagawa University), Masashi Kato (Nagoya University) and Takahiro Osawa (Hokkaido University).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Objective: To determine the effect of combined androgen blockade with a first-generation anti-androgen on the prognoses of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients stratified by tumor burden. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients who were treated with androgen deprivation therapy in 2008–2017 at 30 institutions in Japan. To compare the overall survival and progression-free survival rates of the patients treated with castration monotherapy and combined androgen blockade, we carried out a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using both inverse probability of treatment weighting and instrumental variables methods. High-burden disease was defined as the presence of four or more bone metastases and/or visceral metastasis. Results: Of 2048 patients, 702 (34.3%) and 1346 (65.7%) patients were classified as the low- and high-burden groups, respectively. In each group, >80% of the patients were treated with combined androgen blockade. Although there was no significant between-group difference in the overall survival according to the androgen deprivation therapy method, in the high-burden group the progression-free survival of the combined androgen blockade-treated patients was significantly better than that of patients treated with castration monotherapy: inverse probability of treatment weighting method, hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.71; instrumental variables method, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.98. Conclusion: In the high-burden group, combined androgen blockade with a first-generation anti-androgen resulted in superior progression-free survival compared with castration monotherapy. For well-selected metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, the use of combined androgen blockade might still have some suitable scenarios.
AB - Objective: To determine the effect of combined androgen blockade with a first-generation anti-androgen on the prognoses of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients stratified by tumor burden. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients who were treated with androgen deprivation therapy in 2008–2017 at 30 institutions in Japan. To compare the overall survival and progression-free survival rates of the patients treated with castration monotherapy and combined androgen blockade, we carried out a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using both inverse probability of treatment weighting and instrumental variables methods. High-burden disease was defined as the presence of four or more bone metastases and/or visceral metastasis. Results: Of 2048 patients, 702 (34.3%) and 1346 (65.7%) patients were classified as the low- and high-burden groups, respectively. In each group, >80% of the patients were treated with combined androgen blockade. Although there was no significant between-group difference in the overall survival according to the androgen deprivation therapy method, in the high-burden group the progression-free survival of the combined androgen blockade-treated patients was significantly better than that of patients treated with castration monotherapy: inverse probability of treatment weighting method, hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.71; instrumental variables method, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.98. Conclusion: In the high-burden group, combined androgen blockade with a first-generation anti-androgen resulted in superior progression-free survival compared with castration monotherapy. For well-selected metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, the use of combined androgen blockade might still have some suitable scenarios.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129997267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129997267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iju.14793
DO - 10.1111/iju.14793
M3 - Article
C2 - 35080069
AN - SCOPUS:85129997267
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 29
SP - 398
EP - 405
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 5
ER -