TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of titanium or zirconia implant abutments on epithelial attachments after ultrasonic cleaning
AU - Hu, Jiangqi
AU - Atsuta, Ikiru
AU - Ayukawa, Yasunori
AU - Zhou, Tianren
AU - Narimatsu, Ikue
AU - Koyano, Kiyoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by China Scholarship Council and by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 18K09662 to I Atsuta.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Nihon University, School of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Zirconia is widely employed as a material during dental implant work because of its superior esthetics. This study sought to evaluate the impact of titanium or zirconia implant abutments on epithelial attachments after ultrasonic cleaning. These implants were inserted into the extraction socket of rat maxillary first molars. Then, the length of the horseradish per-oxidase (HRP) reaction was measured. In addition, titanium and zirconia disks were cleaned using an ultrasonic scaler, surface morphology changes were observed, and the number of epithelial cell attachments to the surface was measured. Ultimately, the surfaces of the titanium disks were easier to damage than those of the zirconia ones. There was no difference in the number of epithelial cell attachments between the two materials with the ultrasonic cleaning. The length of the HRP reaction was shorter on the zirconia implant abutment surface than on the titanium one after mechanical cleaning. In conclusion, zirconia is harder than titanium and a better choice for use in the epithelial tissue attachment. Zirconia is more suitable as a material for implant abutments than titanium.
AB - Zirconia is widely employed as a material during dental implant work because of its superior esthetics. This study sought to evaluate the impact of titanium or zirconia implant abutments on epithelial attachments after ultrasonic cleaning. These implants were inserted into the extraction socket of rat maxillary first molars. Then, the length of the horseradish per-oxidase (HRP) reaction was measured. In addition, titanium and zirconia disks were cleaned using an ultrasonic scaler, surface morphology changes were observed, and the number of epithelial cell attachments to the surface was measured. Ultimately, the surfaces of the titanium disks were easier to damage than those of the zirconia ones. There was no difference in the number of epithelial cell attachments between the two materials with the ultrasonic cleaning. The length of the HRP reaction was shorter on the zirconia implant abutment surface than on the titanium one after mechanical cleaning. In conclusion, zirconia is harder than titanium and a better choice for use in the epithelial tissue attachment. Zirconia is more suitable as a material for implant abutments than titanium.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086940590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086940590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2334/josnusd.19-0332
DO - 10.2334/josnusd.19-0332
M3 - Article
C2 - 32581180
AN - SCOPUS:85086940590
SN - 1343-4934
VL - 62
SP - 331
EP - 334
JO - Journal of Oral Science
JF - Journal of Oral Science
IS - 3
ER -