Distinguishing true from pseudo hematoma in the cervical spinal canal using postmortem computed tomography

Spinal cord injury is difficult to detect directly on postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and it is usually diagnosed by indirect findings such as a hematoma in the spinal canal. However, we have encountered cases where the hematoma-like high-attenuation area in the cervical spinal canal was visible on PMCT, while no hematoma was observed at autopsy; we called it a “pseudo hematoma in the cervical spinal canal (pseudo-HCSC).” In this retrospective study, we performed statistical analysis to distinguish true from pseudo-HCSC. The cervical spinal canal was dissected in 35 autopsy cases with a hematoma-like high-attenuation area (CT values 60–100 Hounsfield Unit (HU)) in the spinal canal from the first to the fourth cervical vertebrae in axial slices of PMCT images. Of these 22 had a hematoma and 13 did not (pseudo-HCSC). The location and length of the hematoma-like high-attenuation and spinal cord areas were assessed on reconstructed PMCT images, true HCSC cases had longer the posterior hematoma-like area and shorter the spinal cord area in the midline of the spinal canal (P < 0.05). Furthermore, we found that true HCSC cases were more likely to have fractures and gases on PMCT while pseudo-HCSC cases were more likely to have significant facial congestion (P < 0.05). We suggest that pseudo-HCSC on PMCT is related to congestion of the internal vertebral venous plexus. This study raises awareness about the importance of distinguishing true HCSC from pseudo-HCSC in PMCT diagnosis, and it also presents methods for differentiation between these two groups.