TY - GEN
T1 - Developing Evaluation Criteria for Engineering Training Programs in Remote Medical Education in Asia
AU - Kudo, Kuriko
AU - Ueda, Shintaro
AU - Tomimatsu, Shunta
AU - Hayata, Miho
AU - Kudo, Tatsuro
AU - Antoku, Yasuaki
AU - Kimura, Takuya
AU - Shimizu, Shuji
AU - Moriyama, Tomohiko
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K03148, JP20KI0321, JPI9K03004, JP16H02773 and QR Program (Qdai-jump Research Program) 02103. The authors are grateful for the cooperation of APAN-MWG LET members, especially Mr. Mohamad Zahir Ahiuad (University of Malaya), Mr. Satyanarayana Ungarala (Asian Institute of Gastroenterology), Mr. Cao Due Minh (VinaREN), Mr. Ti-Chuang Chiang (Telecare Industry Association Taiwan), Mr. Chakaphan Sookcharoen (The Thai Red Cross Society), Mr. Wiraphon Manatarinat (Mahidol University Siriraj Hospital), Mr. Tunggul Laksono (Brawijaya University), Mr. Le Vuong Quy (108 Military Central Hospital), Mr. Mohamed Ishaq (Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research), Mr. Darwin Laurencio (University of the Philippines Manila General Hospital), Mr. Alvin M de Gracia (pREGINET), Mr. Niraj Acharya (NREN), Mr. Inho Lee (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Mr. Sajidul Islam(BdREN), Mr. Dihan Morawaka (University of Sri Jayewardenepura), and Mr. Tshering Samdrup (Khesar Gyalpo University). We thank the Edanz Group (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 IEEE.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We developed evaluation criteria for engineer training for international remote medical education with the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network Medical Working Group. A four-level analytic rubric was created for each objective of a previously developed training program. Level 1 was the lowest (incapable) and level 4 the highest (highly capable). We set level 3 (capable) as the attainment target for the training program. We applied the Delphi method for consensus building. The average response rate was 92% (first survey, 16/18; second survey, 17/18). Overall, appropriate consensus was achieved with all the objective items. The evaluation criteria were created following agreement among 17 evaluators from 13 countries and territories. In future research, it will be necessary to evaluate our criteria when assessing participants' achievement levels in actual training.
AB - We developed evaluation criteria for engineer training for international remote medical education with the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network Medical Working Group. A four-level analytic rubric was created for each objective of a previously developed training program. Level 1 was the lowest (incapable) and level 4 the highest (highly capable). We set level 3 (capable) as the attainment target for the training program. We applied the Delphi method for consensus building. The average response rate was 92% (first survey, 16/18; second survey, 17/18). Overall, appropriate consensus was achieved with all the objective items. The evaluation criteria were created following agreement among 17 evaluators from 13 countries and territories. In future research, it will be necessary to evaluate our criteria when assessing participants' achievement levels in actual training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125906518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125906518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678723
DO - 10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678723
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85125906518
T3 - TALE 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education, Proceedings
SP - 965
EP - 969
BT - TALE 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education, Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education, TALE 2021
Y2 - 5 December 2021 through 8 December 2021
ER -