TY - JOUR
T1 - 痒み評価に関するアトピー性皮膚炎痒みコンセンサス会議(AICOM)からの提案
AU - Ebata, Toshiya
AU - Ohya, Yukihiro
AU - Ohshima, Yusei
AU - Andoh, Tsugunobu
AU - Tominaga, Mitsutoshi
AU - Kataoka, Yoko
AU - Fukui, Yoshinori
AU - Ebihara, Nobuyuki
AU - Hasegawa, Shunji
AU - Kobayashi, Shigetoshi
AU - Morisawa, Yutaka
AU - Inoue, Norihiro
AU - Narita, Masami
AU - Kaneko, Sakae
AU - Igawa, Ken
AU - Nakahara, Takeshi
AU - Ishiuji, Yozo
AU - Okada, Takaharu
AU - Fujii, Masanori
AU - Kawasaki, Hiroshi
AU - Irie, Hiroyuki
AU - Shiratori-Hayashi, Miho
AU - Murota, Hiroyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Japanese Society of Allergology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research. Methods: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants. Results: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers. Conclusion: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.
AB - Background: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research. Methods: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants. Results: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers. Conclusion: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.
KW - atopic dermatitis
KW - children
KW - infant
KW - itch assessment
KW - pruritus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188984669&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188984669&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15036/arerugi.73.171
DO - 10.15036/arerugi.73.171
M3 - 学術誌
C2 - 38522931
AN - SCOPUS:85188984669
SN - 0021-4884
VL - 73
SP - 171
EP - 179
JO - Japanese Journal of Allergology
JF - Japanese Journal of Allergology
IS - 2
ER -