Validity of the Japanese version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire

Shingo Kitamura, Akiko Hida, Sayaka Aritake, Shigekazu Higuchi, Minori Enomoto, Mie Kato, Céline Vetter, Till Roenneberg, Kazuo Mishima

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    105 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    To assess circadian preference with a score, the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) has been used for more than 3 decades now. More recently, the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) was developed: it asks for sleep-wake behavior on work and free days and uses the midpoint of sleep on free days (MSF), corrected for sleep debt accumulated during the work week as an indicator of chronotype (MSFsc). In this study, we developed a Japanese version of the MCTQ by using a translation/back-translation approach including an examination of its semantic validity. In a subsequent questionnaire survey, 450 adult men and women completed the Japanese versions of the MCTQ and MEQ. Results showed that MEQ scores were significantly negatively correlated with mid-sleep parameters assessed by the MCTQ, on both, work and free days, as well as with the chronotype measure MSFsc (r = -0.580 to -0.652, all p < 0.001). As in the original German version, the strongest correlation was observed between MEQ score and MSF. A physiological validation study using dim light melatonin onset as a circadian phase marker (N = 37) showed a high correlation between chronotype as assessed with the MSFsc (r = 0.542, p < 0.001), and less so for MEQ score (r = -0.402, p = 0.055). These results demonstrate the validity of the Japanese MCTQ and provide further support of the adequacy of the MCTQ as a chronotype measure.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)845-850
    Number of pages6
    JournalChronobiology International
    Volume31
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Physiology
    • Physiology (medical)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of the Japanese version of the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this