TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcranial alternating current stimulation of α but not β frequency sharpens multiple visual functions
AU - Nakazono, Hisato
AU - Ogata, Katsuya
AU - Takeda, Akinori
AU - Yamada, Emi
AU - Kimura, Takahiro
AU - Tobimatsu, Shozo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI 15J03164 to HN) and Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists (JSPS KAKENHI 18K17720 to HN) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (MEXT KAKENHI 15H05875 to ST).
Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research ( JSPS KAKENHI 15J03164 to HN) and Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists ( JSPS KAKENHI 18K17720 to HN) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ( MEXT KAKENHI 15H05875 to ST).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Background: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain and enhance cortical oscillatory activity in a frequency-dependent manner. In our previous study (Nakazono et al., 2016), 20 Hz (β) tACS significantly increased excitability of primary motor cortex compared with 10 Hz (α) tACS. α oscillations are a prominent feature of the primary visual cortex (V1) in a resting electroencephalogram. Hence, we investigated whether α and β tACS can differentially influence multiple visual functions. Methods: Firstly, we evaluated the after-effects of α and β tACS on pattern-reversal (PR) and focal-flash (FF) visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Secondly, we determined the relationship between resting α oscillations and PR-VEPs modulated by tACS. Thirdly, the behavioral effects of tACS were assessed by contrast sensitivity. Results: α tACS modulated the amplitudes of PR-VEPs, compared with β tACS, but did not modulate the FF-VEPs. Time-frequency analysis revealed that α tACS facilitated event-related α phase synchronizations without increasing power, which consequently increased the PR-VEP amplitudes. There was a significant positive correlation between PR-VEP amplitudes and resting α oscillations. These findings suggested that α tACS modulated α oscillations, and affected visual functions of contrast and spatial frequency. Indeed, α tACS also improved subjects’ contrast sensitivity at the behavioral level. Conversely, β tACS increased posterior α activity, but did not change VEP amplitudes. Conclusions: α tACS can influence different neuronal populations from those influenced by β tACS. Thus, our results provide evidence that α tACS sharpens multiple visual functions by modulating α oscillations in V1.
AB - Background: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain and enhance cortical oscillatory activity in a frequency-dependent manner. In our previous study (Nakazono et al., 2016), 20 Hz (β) tACS significantly increased excitability of primary motor cortex compared with 10 Hz (α) tACS. α oscillations are a prominent feature of the primary visual cortex (V1) in a resting electroencephalogram. Hence, we investigated whether α and β tACS can differentially influence multiple visual functions. Methods: Firstly, we evaluated the after-effects of α and β tACS on pattern-reversal (PR) and focal-flash (FF) visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Secondly, we determined the relationship between resting α oscillations and PR-VEPs modulated by tACS. Thirdly, the behavioral effects of tACS were assessed by contrast sensitivity. Results: α tACS modulated the amplitudes of PR-VEPs, compared with β tACS, but did not modulate the FF-VEPs. Time-frequency analysis revealed that α tACS facilitated event-related α phase synchronizations without increasing power, which consequently increased the PR-VEP amplitudes. There was a significant positive correlation between PR-VEP amplitudes and resting α oscillations. These findings suggested that α tACS modulated α oscillations, and affected visual functions of contrast and spatial frequency. Indeed, α tACS also improved subjects’ contrast sensitivity at the behavioral level. Conversely, β tACS increased posterior α activity, but did not change VEP amplitudes. Conclusions: α tACS can influence different neuronal populations from those influenced by β tACS. Thus, our results provide evidence that α tACS sharpens multiple visual functions by modulating α oscillations in V1.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075346402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075346402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.022
DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2019.10.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 31711878
AN - SCOPUS:85075346402
SN - 1935-861X
VL - 13
SP - 343
EP - 352
JO - Brain Stimulation
JF - Brain Stimulation
IS - 2
ER -