The incidence of chylous ascites after liver transplantation and the proposal of a diagnostic and management protocol

Toshiharu Matsuura, Yusuke Yanagi, Makoto Hayashida, Yoshiaki Takahashi, Koichiro Yoshimaru, Tomoaki Taguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: No protocol has been established for the diagnosis and management of chylous ascites after liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we retrospectively reviewed our cases of posttransplant chylous ascites (PTCA) and aimed to propose a diagnostic and management protocol. Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 96 LT recipients who underwent LT at our department. The incidence of PTCA and the associated risk factors were analyzed and our protocol for chylous ascites was evaluated. Results: PTCA occurred in 6 (6.3%) patients (mean age: 10.7 ± 11.0 years) at a mean of 10.8 ± 3.6 days after LT. The primary disease in all of PTCA cases was biliary atresia (BA). The periportal lymphadnopathy was an independent risk factor for PTCA. In all cases PTCA successfully resolved according to our protocol. Octreotide was administered in 4 of our 6 PTCA cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 40.2 ± 8.4 days, which was similar to that of cases without PTCA. Conclusions: The incidence of PTCA in LT patients, especially in those with BA, is relatively high. Our diagnostic criteria and our management protocol were helpful for patients with refractory ascites after LT. Type of study: Diagnostic test: Level II. Treatment study: Level III.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-675
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The incidence of chylous ascites after liver transplantation and the proposal of a diagnostic and management protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this