TY - JOUR
T1 - The existence of fence-sitters relaxes the spatial prisoner's dilemma and enhances network reciprocity
AU - Miyaji, Kohei
AU - Tanimoto, Jun
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS, Japan, KAKENHI (Grant No. 18K18924) awarded to Professor Tanimoto. We would like to express our gratitude to them.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - We introduce a new spatial prisoner's dilemma (SPD) model in which the so-called network reciprocity is enhanced more than in the conventional model. In addition to the usual binary strategies—perfect cooperator and perfect defector—we introduce “fence-sitters”, who either cooperate or defect with equal probability, as a third strategy. In regions with larger Stag-Hunt-type dilemmas but smaller Chicken-type dilemmas, the existence of the fence-sitters works as a buffer, hampering the exploitation of cooperators by neighboring defectors and significantly enhancing the cooperative phase. Conversely, in regions with larger Chicken-type dilemmas but smaller Stag-Hunt-type dilemmas, the existence of the fence-sitters expands the critical dilemma strength for the survival of cooperation, but it reduces the cooperating fraction more than in the conventional model. What we have found may justify the conclusion that the existence of people with neutral opinions—often regarded betwixt and between—absorbs the severe competition between two extreme groups, bringing a more accommodationist situation to our society, backed with greater cooperation.
AB - We introduce a new spatial prisoner's dilemma (SPD) model in which the so-called network reciprocity is enhanced more than in the conventional model. In addition to the usual binary strategies—perfect cooperator and perfect defector—we introduce “fence-sitters”, who either cooperate or defect with equal probability, as a third strategy. In regions with larger Stag-Hunt-type dilemmas but smaller Chicken-type dilemmas, the existence of the fence-sitters works as a buffer, hampering the exploitation of cooperators by neighboring defectors and significantly enhancing the cooperative phase. Conversely, in regions with larger Chicken-type dilemmas but smaller Stag-Hunt-type dilemmas, the existence of the fence-sitters expands the critical dilemma strength for the survival of cooperation, but it reduces the cooperating fraction more than in the conventional model. What we have found may justify the conclusion that the existence of people with neutral opinions—often regarded betwixt and between—absorbs the severe competition between two extreme groups, bringing a more accommodationist situation to our society, backed with greater cooperation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090329070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090329070&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125624
DO - 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125624
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090329070
SN - 0096-3003
VL - 390
JO - Applied Mathematics and Computation
JF - Applied Mathematics and Computation
M1 - 125624
ER -