TY - JOUR
T1 - The application of a gamma distribution model to diffusion-weighted images of the orofacial region
AU - Chikui, Toru
AU - Tokumori, Kenji
AU - Panyarak, Wannakamon
AU - Togao, Osamu
AU - Yamashita, Yasuo
AU - Kawano, Shintaro
AU - Kamitani, Takeshi
AU - Yoshiura, Kazunori
N1 - Funding Information:
All authors don't have any conflict of interest. This work was supported by a MEXT (The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 18K09770. This work was supported by a MEXT (The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 18K09770.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: This study evaluated the correlation among the diffusion-derived parameters obtained by monoexponential (ME), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and γ distribution (GD) models and compared these parameters among representative orofacial tumours. Methods: Ninety-two patients who underwent 1.5 T MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging were included. The shape parameter (κ), scale parameter (θ), ratio of the intracellular diffusion (ƒ1), extracellular diffusion (ƒ2) and perfusion (ƒ3) were obtained by the GD model; the true diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f) were obtained by the IVIM model; and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was obtained by the ME model. Results: ƒ1 had a strongly negative correlation with the ADC (ρ = −0.993) and D (ρ = −0.926). A strong positive correlation between f and ƒ3 (ρ = 0.709) was found. Malignant lymphoma (ML) had the highest ƒ1, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), malignant salivary gland tumours, pleomorphic adenoma (Pleo) and angioma. Both the IVIM and GD models suggested the highest perfusion in angioma and the lowest perfusion in ML. The GD model demonstrated a high extracellular component in Pleo and revealed that the T4a+T4b SCC group had a lower ƒ2 than the T2+T3 SCC group, and poor to moderately differentiated SCC had a higher ƒ1 than highly differentiated SCC. Conclusions: Given the correlation among the diffusion-derived parameters, the GD model might be a good alternative to the IVIM model. Furthermore, the GD model's parameters were useful for characterizing the pathological structure.
AB - Objectives: This study evaluated the correlation among the diffusion-derived parameters obtained by monoexponential (ME), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and γ distribution (GD) models and compared these parameters among representative orofacial tumours. Methods: Ninety-two patients who underwent 1.5 T MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging were included. The shape parameter (κ), scale parameter (θ), ratio of the intracellular diffusion (ƒ1), extracellular diffusion (ƒ2) and perfusion (ƒ3) were obtained by the GD model; the true diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f) were obtained by the IVIM model; and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was obtained by the ME model. Results: ƒ1 had a strongly negative correlation with the ADC (ρ = −0.993) and D (ρ = −0.926). A strong positive correlation between f and ƒ3 (ρ = 0.709) was found. Malignant lymphoma (ML) had the highest ƒ1, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), malignant salivary gland tumours, pleomorphic adenoma (Pleo) and angioma. Both the IVIM and GD models suggested the highest perfusion in angioma and the lowest perfusion in ML. The GD model demonstrated a high extracellular component in Pleo and revealed that the T4a+T4b SCC group had a lower ƒ2 than the T2+T3 SCC group, and poor to moderately differentiated SCC had a higher ƒ1 than highly differentiated SCC. Conclusions: Given the correlation among the diffusion-derived parameters, the GD model might be a good alternative to the IVIM model. Furthermore, the GD model's parameters were useful for characterizing the pathological structure.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100361813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100361813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20200252
DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20200252
M3 - Article
C2 - 32706975
AN - SCOPUS:85100361813
SN - 0250-832X
VL - 50
JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
IS - 2
M1 - 20200252
ER -