TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Ji, F.
AU - Yeo, Yee Hui
AU - Wei, Mike Tzuhen
AU - Ogawa, Eiichi
AU - Enomoto, Masaru
AU - Lee, Dong Hyun
AU - Iio, Etsuko
AU - Lubel, John
AU - Wang, Wenjun
AU - Wei, Bin
AU - Ide, Tatsuya
AU - Preda, Carmen Monica
AU - Conti, F.
AU - Minami, Tatsuya
AU - Bielen, Rob
AU - Sezaki, Hitomi
AU - Barone, Michele
AU - Kolly, Philippe
AU - Chu, Po sung
AU - Virlogeux, Victor
AU - Eurich, Dennis
AU - Henry, L.
AU - Bass, Michelle B.
AU - Kanai, Takanori
AU - Dang, Shuangsuo
AU - Li, Zongfang
AU - Dufour, Jean François
AU - Zoulim, Fabien
AU - Andreone, Pietro
AU - Cheung, Ramsey C.
AU - Tanaka, Yasuhito
AU - Furusyo, Norihiro
AU - Toyoda, Hidenori
AU - Tamori, Akihiro
AU - Nguyen, Mindie H.
N1 - Funding Information:
Yee Hui Yeo, Mike Tzuhen Wei, Eiichi Ogawa, Masaru Enomoto, Dong Hyun Lee, Etsuko Iio, Wenjun Wang, Bin Wei, Tatsuya Ide, Michelle B Bass, Carmen Monica Preda, Fabio Conti, Rob Bielen, Hitomi Sezaki, Michele Barone, Po-sung Chu, Victor Virlogeux, Dennis Eurich, Takanori Kanai, Shuangsuo Dang, Zongfang Li, Akihiro Tamori: None to disclose. Fanpu Ji: Speaker Gilead Sciences, MSD and Ascletis. John Lubel: Research support (Institutional support only) Abbvie, BMS, MSD; consulting/advisory board Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS; speaker Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Roche, Janssen; travel to international meetings by Bayer Tatsuya Minami; speaker’s bureau MSD and Gilead Sciences. Philippe Kolly: Conference fee and travel cost reimbursement Gilead Sciences. Jean-François Dufour: Advisory committees Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Falk, Genfit, Gilead Science, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, Novartis; speaking and teaching Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Genfit, Gilead Science, Novartis; unrestricted research grant Bayer. Fabien Zoulim: Consultant for Abbvie and Gilead Sciences. Pietro Andreone: Grant/research support MSD, Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, BMS; advisory board MSD, Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, BMS, INTERCEPT. Ramsey C. Cheung: Grant/research support Gilead Sciences. Norihiro Furusyo: Grant/research support MSD, Gilead Sciences, BMS, Janssen Pharmaceuticals; speaker’s bureau Gilead Sciences, MSD, BMS; advisory board Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, BMS. Yasuhito Tanaka: Grant/research support BMS, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Chugai Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; speaker’s bureau BMS, MSD, Gilead Sciences. Hidenori Toyoda: Speaker’s bureau AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, MSD, Bayer Pharmaceuticals. Mindie Nguyen: Grant/research support Gilead Sciences, Janssen; advisory board member or consultant Gilead Sciences, Janssen.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Background & Aims: The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the response to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection remains unclear. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we aimed to investigate the effect of DAA therapy on sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients with CHC and either active, inactive or no HCC. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1/1/2013 to 9/24/2018. The pooled SVR rates were computed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Results: We included 49 studies from 15 countries, comprised of 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC. Overall, the pooled SVR was lower in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (89.6%, 95% CI 86.8–92.1%, I2 = 79.1% vs. 93.3%, 95% CI 91.9–94.7%, I2 = 95.0%, p = 0.0012), translating to a 4.8% (95% CI 0.2–7.4%) SVR reduction by meta-regression analysis. The largest SVR reduction (18.8%) occurred in patients with active/residual HCC vs. inactive/ablated HCC (SVR 73.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, patients with HCC who received a prior liver transplant had higher SVR rates than those who did not (p <0.001). Regarding specific DAA regimens, patients with HCC treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had lower SVR rates than patients without HCC (92.6%, n = 884 vs. 97.8%, n = 13,141, p = 0.026), but heterogeneity was high (I2 = 84.7%, p <0.001). The SVR rate was similar in patients with/without HCC who were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir (n = 101) (97.2% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.79), or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (91.7% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.66). Conclusion: Overall, SVR rates were lower in patients with HCC, especially with active HCC, compared to those without HCC, though heterogeneity was high. Continued efforts are needed to aggressively screen, diagnose, and treat HCC to ensure higher CHC cure rates. Lay summary: There are now medications (direct-acting antivirals or “DAAs”) that can “cure” hepatitis C virus, but patients with hepatitis C and liver cancer may be less likely to achieve cure than those without liver cancer. However, patients with liver cancer are also more likely to have advanced liver disease and risk factors that can decrease cure rates, so better controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
AB - Background & Aims: The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the response to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection remains unclear. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we aimed to investigate the effect of DAA therapy on sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients with CHC and either active, inactive or no HCC. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1/1/2013 to 9/24/2018. The pooled SVR rates were computed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Results: We included 49 studies from 15 countries, comprised of 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC. Overall, the pooled SVR was lower in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (89.6%, 95% CI 86.8–92.1%, I2 = 79.1% vs. 93.3%, 95% CI 91.9–94.7%, I2 = 95.0%, p = 0.0012), translating to a 4.8% (95% CI 0.2–7.4%) SVR reduction by meta-regression analysis. The largest SVR reduction (18.8%) occurred in patients with active/residual HCC vs. inactive/ablated HCC (SVR 73.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, patients with HCC who received a prior liver transplant had higher SVR rates than those who did not (p <0.001). Regarding specific DAA regimens, patients with HCC treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had lower SVR rates than patients without HCC (92.6%, n = 884 vs. 97.8%, n = 13,141, p = 0.026), but heterogeneity was high (I2 = 84.7%, p <0.001). The SVR rate was similar in patients with/without HCC who were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir (n = 101) (97.2% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.79), or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (91.7% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.66). Conclusion: Overall, SVR rates were lower in patients with HCC, especially with active HCC, compared to those without HCC, though heterogeneity was high. Continued efforts are needed to aggressively screen, diagnose, and treat HCC to ensure higher CHC cure rates. Lay summary: There are now medications (direct-acting antivirals or “DAAs”) that can “cure” hepatitis C virus, but patients with hepatitis C and liver cancer may be less likely to achieve cure than those without liver cancer. However, patients with liver cancer are also more likely to have advanced liver disease and risk factors that can decrease cure rates, so better controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067690668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067690668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 31096005
AN - SCOPUS:85067690668
SN - 0168-8278
VL - 71
SP - 473
EP - 485
JO - Journal of Hepatology
JF - Journal of Hepatology
IS - 3
ER -