TY - GEN
T1 - Static burning tests on a bread board model of altering-intenisty swirling-oxidizer-flow-type hybrid rocket engine
AU - Ozawa, Kohei
AU - Usuki, Tomoaki
AU - Mishima, Genki
AU - Kitagawa, Koki
AU - Yamashita, Masato
AU - Mizuchi, Masato
AU - Katakami, Koki
AU - Maji, Yudai
AU - Aso, Shigeru
AU - Tani, Yasuhiro
AU - Wada, Yutaka
AU - Shimada, Toru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - A bread board model of Altering-number Swirling Flow Type (A-SOFT) hybrid rocket engine has been newly developed and the static burning tests have been conducted. A-SOFT hybrid rocket engines have controllability of both thrust and O/F without any replacement of components in the engine. This advantage is acquired by controlling oxidizer mass flow rate and effective swirl number. The purpose of this set of experiments is to confirm the continuity, monotonousness and predictability of the performances of A-SOFTs. The A-SOFT BBM showed a favorable fuel regression behavior. The fuel regression averaged along spatial direction fit the shape of regression rate function proposed before the experiments within ±3.5% errors, and the fuel regression rates are continuous and monotonous along swirl number and oxidizer mass flux. The O/F and thrust data also respectively fit the prediction formulas within ±4.2% and ±4.7% errors. c* efficiency is evaluated with the Isp efficiency - nozzle efficiency ratio ηIsp/ ηCF in order to compensate the pressure sensing errors caused by the centrifugal forces of swirling flows. Though ηIsp/ ηCF in the cases of weak swirl injection was clearly larger than in the cases of axial injection, its dependence on effective geometric swirl number was not clear in strong swirl conditions.
AB - A bread board model of Altering-number Swirling Flow Type (A-SOFT) hybrid rocket engine has been newly developed and the static burning tests have been conducted. A-SOFT hybrid rocket engines have controllability of both thrust and O/F without any replacement of components in the engine. This advantage is acquired by controlling oxidizer mass flow rate and effective swirl number. The purpose of this set of experiments is to confirm the continuity, monotonousness and predictability of the performances of A-SOFTs. The A-SOFT BBM showed a favorable fuel regression behavior. The fuel regression averaged along spatial direction fit the shape of regression rate function proposed before the experiments within ±3.5% errors, and the fuel regression rates are continuous and monotonous along swirl number and oxidizer mass flux. The O/F and thrust data also respectively fit the prediction formulas within ±4.2% and ±4.7% errors. c* efficiency is evaluated with the Isp efficiency - nozzle efficiency ratio ηIsp/ ηCF in order to compensate the pressure sensing errors caused by the centrifugal forces of swirling flows. Though ηIsp/ ηCF in the cases of weak swirl injection was clearly larger than in the cases of axial injection, its dependence on effective geometric swirl number was not clear in strong swirl conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983537167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983537167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84983537167
SN - 9781624104060
T3 - 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2016
BT - 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2016
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2016
Y2 - 25 July 2016 through 27 July 2016
ER -