TY - JOUR
T1 - Spontaneous postural sway predicts the strength of smooth vection
AU - Palmisano, Stephen
AU - Apthorp, Deborah
AU - Seno, Takeharu
AU - Stapley, Paul J.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability - measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open - was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.
AB - This study asked whether individual differences in the influence of vision on postural stability could be used to predict the strength of subsequently induced visual illusions of self-motion (vection). In the experiment, we first measured spontaneous postural sway while subjects stood erect for 60 s with their eyes both open and both closed. We then showed our subjects two types of self-motion display: radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion) and vertically oscillating radially expanding optic flow (simulating constant velocity forwards self-motion combined with vertical head oscillation). As expected, subjects swayed more with their eyes closed (compared to open) and experienced more compelling illusions of self-motion with vertically oscillating (as opposed to smooth) radial flow. The extent to which participants relied on vision for postural stability - measured as the ratio of sway with eyes closed compared to that with eyes open - was found to predict vection strength. However, this was only the case for displays representing smooth self-motion. It seems that for oscillating displays, other factors, such as visual-vestibular interactions, may be more important.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897027297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897027297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y
DO - 10.1007/s00221-014-3835-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 24449012
AN - SCOPUS:84897027297
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 232
SP - 1185
EP - 1191
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 4
ER -