TY - JOUR
T1 - Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol
T2 - A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data
AU - Kim, Dongchul
AU - Chin, Mian
AU - Yu, Hongbin
AU - Diehl, Thomas
AU - Tan, Qian
AU - Kahn, Ralph A.
AU - Tsigaridis, Kostas
AU - Bauer, Susanne E.
AU - Takemura, Toshihiko
AU - Pozzoli, Luca
AU - Bellouin, Nicolas
AU - Schulz, Michael
AU - Peyridieu, Sophie
AU - Chédin, Alain
AU - Koffi, Brigitte
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2014/5/27
Y1 - 2014/5/27
N2 - This study evaluates model-simulated dust aerosols over North Africa and the North Atlantic from five global models that participated in the Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models phase II model experiments. The model results are compared with satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), and Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor, dust optical depth (DOD) derived from MODIS and MISR, AOD and coarse-mode AOD (as a proxy of DOD) from ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network Sun photometer measurements, and dust vertical distributions/centroid height from Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder satellite AOD retrievals. We examine the following quantities of AOD and DOD: (1) the magnitudes over land and over ocean in our study domain, (2) the longitudinal gradient from the dust source region over North Africa to the western North Atlantic, (3) seasonal variations at different locations, and (4) the dust vertical profile shape and the AOD centroid height (altitude above or below which half of the AOD is located). The different satellite data show consistent features in most of these aspects; however, the models display large diversity in all of them, with significant differences among the models and between models and observations. By examining dust emission, removal, and mass extinction efficiency in the five models, we also find remarkable differences among the models that all contribute to the discrepancies of model-simulated dust amount and distribution. This study highlights the challenges in simulating the dust physical and optical processes, even in the best known dust environment, and stresses the need for observable quantities to constrain the model processes.
AB - This study evaluates model-simulated dust aerosols over North Africa and the North Atlantic from five global models that participated in the Aerosol Comparison between Observations and Models phase II model experiments. The model results are compared with satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR), and Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor, dust optical depth (DOD) derived from MODIS and MISR, AOD and coarse-mode AOD (as a proxy of DOD) from ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network Sun photometer measurements, and dust vertical distributions/centroid height from Cloud Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization and Atmospheric Infrared Sounder satellite AOD retrievals. We examine the following quantities of AOD and DOD: (1) the magnitudes over land and over ocean in our study domain, (2) the longitudinal gradient from the dust source region over North Africa to the western North Atlantic, (3) seasonal variations at different locations, and (4) the dust vertical profile shape and the AOD centroid height (altitude above or below which half of the AOD is located). The different satellite data show consistent features in most of these aspects; however, the models display large diversity in all of them, with significant differences among the models and between models and observations. By examining dust emission, removal, and mass extinction efficiency in the five models, we also find remarkable differences among the models that all contribute to the discrepancies of model-simulated dust amount and distribution. This study highlights the challenges in simulating the dust physical and optical processes, even in the best known dust environment, and stresses the need for observable quantities to constrain the model processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902787498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902787498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2013JD021099
DO - 10.1002/2013JD021099
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84902787498
SN - 0148-0227
VL - 119
SP - 6259
EP - 6277
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research
IS - 10
ER -