TY - JOUR
T1 - Slaves to rival nationalisms
T2 - Unesco and the politics of ‘comfort women’ commemoration
AU - Vickers, Edward
N1 - Funding Information:
2013?? 2 ?ark Frost, Daniel Schumacher and Edward Vickers (eds?, Remembering Asia ᤀs World War Two. (New York and London: Routledge, 2019?? Both this network and the one that resulted in the ?orris et al volume were funded by the Leverhulme Trust (UK?? See here for more on the WAR?AP network? 3 Edward Vickers, ᰀCommemorating ᠀Comfort Women ᤀ Beyond Korea: the Chinese case, ᴀ in Frost et al (eds?, Remembering Asia ᤀs World War Two. N( ew York and London: Routledge, 2019?: 174-207? 4 Vickers, ibid? 5 ?GIEP, Rethinking Schooling for the 21st Century: The State of Education for Peace, Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship in Asia. (New Delhi: UNESCO-?GIEP, 2017a?? 6 Jerry ?uller, The Tyranny of Metrics. (Princeton University Press, 2018?? With Yoko ?ochizuki, I am currently editing a special issue of the journal Compare analysing the politics of UNESCO ᤀs education-related work (publication due in 2022?? 7 ?GIEP, op. cit. (2017a?? 8 See, for example, ?GIEP, The Blue Dot, Issue 6? (New Delhi: UNESCO-?GIEP, 2017b?? 9 Yoko ?ochizuki, ᠀Introduction, ᤀ in J? Singer, T? Gannon, F? Noguchi and Y? ?ochizuki (eds?, Education for Sustainability in Japan: Fostering resilient communities after the triple disaster. (New York and London: Routledge, 2017?: 1-24? 10 Ran Zwigenberg, Hiroshima: The Origins of Global Memory Culture. (Cambridge University Press, 2014?? 11 Ibid., p? 52? 12 Ray Edmondson, Memory of the World: General Guidelines to Safeguard Documentary Heritage. (Paris: UNESCO Information Society Division, 2002?? 13 Ryoko Nakano, ᰀA failure of global documentary heritage? UNESCO's ᠀memory of the world ? and heritage dissonance in East Asia, ᴀC ontemporary Politics 24?4, 1-16 (2018?: 6? 14 Shu-?ei Huang and Hyun-Kyung Lee, ᰀDifficult heritage diplomacy? Re-articulating places of pain and shame as world heritage in northeast Asia, ᴀI nternational Journal of Heritage Studies, 25/2 (2019?: 143-159 (147?? 15 Tim Winter, ᰀHeritage Diplomacy, ᴀIn ternational Journal of Heritage Studies, 21/10 (2015?: 997-1015? 16 Tomomi Yamaguchi, ᰀThe ᠀Japan is Great! ᤀ Boom, Historical Revisionism, and the Government, ᴀT he Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 15/6, No? 3 (2017?? 17 Ibid?, p? 3? 18 Quoted in Ibid? 19 WHC (World Heritage Centre?, ᰀSites of Japan ᤀs ?eiji Industrial Revolution: Iron and Steel, Shipbuilding and Coal ining, ? World Heritage List. UNESCO: WHC (2018?? (accessed November 1, 2018?? 20 At a ?inistry of Foreign Affairs press conference held on July 5, 2015, to mark UNESCO inscription of the ᠀Sites of the eiji Industrial Revolution ᤀ, Foreign inister Kishida Fumio insisted that the expression ᠀forced to work ᤀ (to which Japan had agreed? did not imply the use of ᠀forced labor (?accessed February 9, 2021 For more on the controversy surrounding this World Heritage inscription, see Edward Boyle, ᰀBorders of ?emory: Affirmation and Contestation over Japan ᤀs Heritage, Jᴀa pan Forum, Vol? 31 (2019?: 293-312? In my own visits to sites or exhibitions relating to this World Heritage bid (e?g? in Kita-Kyushu and Hagi?, I have found no reference to Japanese colonialism or the deployment of Korean or Chinese forced labour? 21 Nakano, op. cit., p? 11? 22 Rana ?itter, China ᤀs War with Japan: 1937-1945.L ondon: Allen Lane (2013: 135? 23 ?aizuru City, ᰀNomination Form International ?emory of the World Register Return to ?aizuru Port ᐀Documents Related to the Internment and Repatriation Experiences of Japanese (1945-1956? ? (2014?
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Japan Focus. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In October 2017, the application to list the Voices of the Comfort Women archive on UNESCO’s “Memory of the World Register” was rejected (or “postponed”). In this paper, I set that decision in the context of other recent instances of “heritage diplomacy” in East Asia, highlighting the tensions between nationalistic agendas and UNESCO’s universalist pretensions. I then discuss the nature and extent of similar tensions in the framing of the “comfort women” issue, as manifested in “comfort women museums” (institutions closely associated with the preparation of the 2016-17 Memory of the World application). I focus especially on the case of China, where the Xi Jinping regime first sought to weaponize this issue against Japan, only to pull back in 2018 as Sino-Japanese ties warmed. I conclude by considering how the story of the comfort women might be reframed to underline its global significance (or “outstanding universal value”), in a manner that makes it more difficult for Japanese nationalists to portray the campaign for recognition and commemoration as an anti-Japan conspiracy.
AB - In October 2017, the application to list the Voices of the Comfort Women archive on UNESCO’s “Memory of the World Register” was rejected (or “postponed”). In this paper, I set that decision in the context of other recent instances of “heritage diplomacy” in East Asia, highlighting the tensions between nationalistic agendas and UNESCO’s universalist pretensions. I then discuss the nature and extent of similar tensions in the framing of the “comfort women” issue, as manifested in “comfort women museums” (institutions closely associated with the preparation of the 2016-17 Memory of the World application). I focus especially on the case of China, where the Xi Jinping regime first sought to weaponize this issue against Japan, only to pull back in 2018 as Sino-Japanese ties warmed. I conclude by considering how the story of the comfort women might be reframed to underline its global significance (or “outstanding universal value”), in a manner that makes it more difficult for Japanese nationalists to portray the campaign for recognition and commemoration as an anti-Japan conspiracy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102583250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102583250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102583250
SN - 1557-4660
VL - 19
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
JF - Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
IS - 5
M1 - 5546
ER -