TY - JOUR
T1 - Silencing and activating anergic B cells*
AU - Tanaka, Shinya
AU - Ise, Wataru
AU - Baba, Yoshihiro
AU - Kurosaki, Tomohiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by research grants from JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP19K08883, JP21H00429, JP21H05530 to ST, JP21H02753, JP21K18256 to YB, JP17K08883 to WI, JP26221306, JP21228997, JP19H01028 to TK), the Japan Science Technology Agency (CREST J098501018 to TK), AMED (19gm6110004 to YB), and SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation to WI.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Despite the existence of central tolerance mechanisms, including clonal deletion and receptor editing to eliminate self-reactive B cells, moderately self-reactive cells still survive in the periphery (about 20% of peripheral B cells). These cells normally exist in a functionally silenced state called anergy; thus, anergy has been thought to contribute to tolerance by active-silencing of potentially dangerous B cells. However, a positive rationale for the existence of these anergic B cells has recently been suggested by discoveries that broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV and influenza virus possess poly- and/or auto-reactivity. Given the conundrum of generating inherent holes in the immune repertoire, retaining weakly self-reactive BCRs on anergic B cells could allow these antibodies to serve as an effective defense against pathogens, particularly in the case of pathogens that mimic forbidden self-epitopes to evade the host immune system. Thus, anergic B cells should be brought into a silenced or activated state, depending on their contexts. Here, we review recent progress in our understanding of how the anergic B cell state is controlled in B cell–intrinsic and B cell–extrinsic ways.
AB - Despite the existence of central tolerance mechanisms, including clonal deletion and receptor editing to eliminate self-reactive B cells, moderately self-reactive cells still survive in the periphery (about 20% of peripheral B cells). These cells normally exist in a functionally silenced state called anergy; thus, anergy has been thought to contribute to tolerance by active-silencing of potentially dangerous B cells. However, a positive rationale for the existence of these anergic B cells has recently been suggested by discoveries that broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV and influenza virus possess poly- and/or auto-reactivity. Given the conundrum of generating inherent holes in the immune repertoire, retaining weakly self-reactive BCRs on anergic B cells could allow these antibodies to serve as an effective defense against pathogens, particularly in the case of pathogens that mimic forbidden self-epitopes to evade the host immune system. Thus, anergic B cells should be brought into a silenced or activated state, depending on their contexts. Here, we review recent progress in our understanding of how the anergic B cell state is controlled in B cell–intrinsic and B cell–extrinsic ways.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121317406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121317406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/imr.13053
DO - 10.1111/imr.13053
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34908172
AN - SCOPUS:85121317406
SN - 0105-2896
VL - 307
SP - 43
EP - 52
JO - Immunological Reviews
JF - Immunological Reviews
IS - 1
ER -