TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors
T2 - Japanese multicenter prospective C-NET STUDY
AU - The C-NET STUDY Group
AU - Ito, Sayo
AU - Hotta, Kinichi
AU - Sekiguchi, Masau
AU - Takeuchi, Yoji
AU - Oka, Shiro
AU - Yamamoto, Hironori
AU - Shinmura, Kensuke
AU - Harada, Keita
AU - Uraoka, Toshio
AU - Hisabe, Takashi
AU - Sano, Yasushi
AU - Kondo, Hitoshi
AU - Horimatsu, Takahiro
AU - Kikuchi, Hidezumi
AU - Kawamura, Takuji
AU - Nagata, Shinji
AU - Yamamoto, Katsumi
AU - Tajika, Masahiro
AU - Tsuji, Shigetsugu
AU - Kusaka, Toshihiro
AU - Okuyama, Yusuke
AU - Yoshida, Naohisa
AU - Moriyama, Tomohiko
AU - Hasebe, Aki
AU - So, Suketo
AU - Saito, Yutaka
AU - Nakahira, Hiroko
AU - Ishikawa, Hideki
AU - Matsuda, Takahisa
AU - Tanaka, Shinji
AU - Kobara, Hideki
AU - Kashida, Hiroshi
AU - Miyanaga, Ryoichi
AU - Kato, Sosuke
AU - Hayashi, Yoshito
AU - Kobayashi, Kiyonori
AU - Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
AU - Kato, Hiroyuki
AU - Takayama, Tetsuji
AU - Konishi, Jun
AU - Matsushita, Hiro o.
AU - Narasaka, Toshiaki
AU - Ohata, Ken
AU - Togashi, Kazutomo
AU - Nakamura, Hisashi
AU - Moriichi, Kentaro
AU - Oda, Yasushi
AU - Kanda, Naoki
AU - Kuwai, Toshio
AU - Terai, Shuji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Objectives: The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased with colorectal cancer screening programs and increased colonoscopies. The management of colorectal NETs has recently shifted from radical surgery to endoscopic resection. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of various methods of endoscopic resection for colorectal NETs. Methods: Among those registered in the C-NET STUDY, patients with colorectal NETs who underwent endoscopic treatment as the initial therapy were included. Short-term outcomes, such as the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection (en bloc resection with tumor-free margin) rate, were analyzed based on treatment modalities. Results: A total of 472 patients with 477 colorectal NETs received endoscopic treatment. Of these, 418 patients with 421 lesions who met the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 55 years, and 56.9% of them were men. The lower rectum was the most commonly affected site (88.6%), and lesions <10 mm accounted for 87% of the cases. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L, 56.5%) was the most common method, followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 31.4%) and endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap (EMR-C, 8.5%). R0 resection rates <10 mm were 95.5%, 94.8%, and 94.3% for ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C, respectively. All 16 (3.8%) patients who developed treatment-related complications could be treated conservatively. Overall, 23 (5.5%) patients had incomplete resection without independent clinicopathological risk factors. Conclusion: ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C were equally effective and safe for colorectal NETs with a diameter <10 mm.
AB - Objectives: The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased with colorectal cancer screening programs and increased colonoscopies. The management of colorectal NETs has recently shifted from radical surgery to endoscopic resection. We aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of various methods of endoscopic resection for colorectal NETs. Methods: Among those registered in the C-NET STUDY, patients with colorectal NETs who underwent endoscopic treatment as the initial therapy were included. Short-term outcomes, such as the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection (en bloc resection with tumor-free margin) rate, were analyzed based on treatment modalities. Results: A total of 472 patients with 477 colorectal NETs received endoscopic treatment. Of these, 418 patients with 421 lesions who met the eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 55 years, and 56.9% of them were men. The lower rectum was the most commonly affected site (88.6%), and lesions <10 mm accounted for 87% of the cases. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L, 56.5%) was the most common method, followed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, 31.4%) and endoscopic mucosal resection using a cap (EMR-C, 8.5%). R0 resection rates <10 mm were 95.5%, 94.8%, and 94.3% for ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C, respectively. All 16 (3.8%) patients who developed treatment-related complications could be treated conservatively. Overall, 23 (5.5%) patients had incomplete resection without independent clinicopathological risk factors. Conclusion: ESMR-L, ESD, and EMR-C were equally effective and safe for colorectal NETs with a diameter <10 mm.
KW - colonoscopy
KW - colorectal neuroendocrine tumor
KW - endoscopic mucosal resection
KW - endoscopic submucosal dissection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182464858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182464858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/den.14728
DO - 10.1111/den.14728
M3 - Article
C2 - 37986226
AN - SCOPUS:85182464858
SN - 0915-5635
VL - 36
SP - 942
EP - 951
JO - Digestive Endoscopy
JF - Digestive Endoscopy
IS - 8
ER -