TY - JOUR
T1 - Severe aortic stenosis in dialysis patients
AU - on behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators
AU - Kawase, Yuichi
AU - Taniguchi, Tomohiko
AU - Morimoto, Takeshi
AU - Kadota, Kazushige
AU - Iwasaki, Keiichiro
AU - Kuwayama, Akimune
AU - Ohya, Masanobu
AU - Shimada, Takenobu
AU - Amano, Hidewo
AU - Maruo, Takeshi
AU - Fuku, Yasushi
AU - Izumi, Chisato
AU - Kitai, Takeshi
AU - Saito, Naritatsu
AU - Minamino-Muta, Eri
AU - Kato, Takao
AU - Inada, Tsukasa
AU - Inoko, Moriaki
AU - Ishii, Katsuhisa
AU - Komiya, Tatsuhiko
AU - Hanyu, Michiya
AU - Minatoya, Kenji
AU - Kimura, Takeshi
AU - Sakata, Ryuzo
AU - Shiomi, Hiroki
AU - Imai, Masao
AU - Tazaki, Junichi
AU - Toyota, Toshiaki
AU - Higami, Hirooki
AU - Kawaji, Tetsuma
AU - Ando, Kenji
AU - Shirai, Shinichi
AU - Korai, Kengo
AU - Arita, Takeshi
AU - Miura, Shiro
AU - Yamaji, Kyohei
AU - Aoyama, Takeshi
AU - Kanamori, Norio
AU - Onodera, Tomoya
AU - Murata, Koichiro
AU - Furukawa, Yutaka
AU - Kim, Kitae
AU - Miyawaki, Hiroshi
AU - Misao, Ayumi
AU - Nakagawa, Yoshihisa
AU - Miyake, Makoto
AU - Amano, Masashi
AU - Takahashi, Yusuke
AU - Yoshikawa, Yusuke
AU - Nishimura, Shunsuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Background-Characteristics and prognosis of hemodialysis patients with severe aortic stenosis have not yet been well defined. Methods and Results-The CURRENT AS (contemporary outcomes after surgery and medical treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis) registry, a Japanese multicenter registry, enrolled 3815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis. There were 405 hemodialysis patients (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] group: N=135 [33.3%], and conservative group: N=270) and 3410 nonhemodialysis patients (initial AVR group: N=1062 [31.1%], and conservative group: N=2348). The median follow-up duration after the index echocardiography was 1361 days, with 90% follow-up rate at 2 years. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in hemodialysis patients than in nonhemodialysis patients in both the entire cohort (71% versus 40%, P < 0.001) and in the initial AVR group (63.2% versus 17.9%, P < 0.001). Among hemodialysis patients, the initial AVR group as compared with the conservative group was associated with significantly lower cumulative 5-year incidences of all-cause death (60.6% versus 75.5%, P < 0.001) and sudden death (10.2% versus 31.7%, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the rate of aortic valve procedure-related death, which predominantly occurred within 6 months of the AVR procedure, was markedly higher in the hemodialysis patients than in the nonhemodialysis patients (21.2% and 2.3%, P < 0.001). Conclusions-Among hemodialysis patients with severe aortic stenosis, the initial AVR strategy as compared with the conservative strategy was associated with significantly lower long-term mortality risk, particularly the risk for sudden death, although the effect size for the survival benefit of the initial AVR strategy was smaller than that in the nonhemodialysis patients.
AB - Background-Characteristics and prognosis of hemodialysis patients with severe aortic stenosis have not yet been well defined. Methods and Results-The CURRENT AS (contemporary outcomes after surgery and medical treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis) registry, a Japanese multicenter registry, enrolled 3815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis. There were 405 hemodialysis patients (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] group: N=135 [33.3%], and conservative group: N=270) and 3410 nonhemodialysis patients (initial AVR group: N=1062 [31.1%], and conservative group: N=2348). The median follow-up duration after the index echocardiography was 1361 days, with 90% follow-up rate at 2 years. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in hemodialysis patients than in nonhemodialysis patients in both the entire cohort (71% versus 40%, P < 0.001) and in the initial AVR group (63.2% versus 17.9%, P < 0.001). Among hemodialysis patients, the initial AVR group as compared with the conservative group was associated with significantly lower cumulative 5-year incidences of all-cause death (60.6% versus 75.5%, P < 0.001) and sudden death (10.2% versus 31.7%, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the rate of aortic valve procedure-related death, which predominantly occurred within 6 months of the AVR procedure, was markedly higher in the hemodialysis patients than in the nonhemodialysis patients (21.2% and 2.3%, P < 0.001). Conclusions-Among hemodialysis patients with severe aortic stenosis, the initial AVR strategy as compared with the conservative strategy was associated with significantly lower long-term mortality risk, particularly the risk for sudden death, although the effect size for the survival benefit of the initial AVR strategy was smaller than that in the nonhemodialysis patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025464856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025464856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.116.004961
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.116.004961
M3 - Article
C2 - 28710181
AN - SCOPUS:85025464856
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 6
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 7
M1 - e004961
ER -