TY - JOUR
T1 - Schooling, politics and the construction of identity in Hong Kong
T2 - the 2012 ‘Moral and National Education’ crisis in historical context
AU - Morris, Paul
AU - Vickers, Edward
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2015/7/3
Y1 - 2015/7/3
N2 - Since Hong Kong’s retrocession, the government has endeavoured to strengthen local citizens’ identification with the People’s Republic of China – a project that acquired new impetus with the 2010 decision to introduce ‘Moral and National Education’ (MNE) as a compulsory school subject. In the face of strong local opposition, this policy was withdrawn in 2012, and implementation of MNE made optional. This article seeks to elucidate the background to the MNE controversy of 2012 by locating the emergence of a distinctive Hong Kong identity in its historical context, and analysing successive official attempts (before and after the 1997 retrocession) to use schooling for purposes of political socialisation. We argue that the school curriculum has projected and reflected a dual sense of identity: a ‘Chineseness’ located mainly in ethno-cultural qualities, and a ‘Hongkongeseness’ rooted in civic attributes. While reinforced by schooling, local civic consciousness has been intimately related to a tradition of public activism strongly evident since the 1970s, and further strengthened post-1997.
AB - Since Hong Kong’s retrocession, the government has endeavoured to strengthen local citizens’ identification with the People’s Republic of China – a project that acquired new impetus with the 2010 decision to introduce ‘Moral and National Education’ (MNE) as a compulsory school subject. In the face of strong local opposition, this policy was withdrawn in 2012, and implementation of MNE made optional. This article seeks to elucidate the background to the MNE controversy of 2012 by locating the emergence of a distinctive Hong Kong identity in its historical context, and analysing successive official attempts (before and after the 1997 retrocession) to use schooling for purposes of political socialisation. We argue that the school curriculum has projected and reflected a dual sense of identity: a ‘Chineseness’ located mainly in ethno-cultural qualities, and a ‘Hongkongeseness’ rooted in civic attributes. While reinforced by schooling, local civic consciousness has been intimately related to a tradition of public activism strongly evident since the 1970s, and further strengthened post-1997.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939267040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939267040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03050068.2015.1033169
DO - 10.1080/03050068.2015.1033169
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939267040
SN - 0305-0068
VL - 51
SP - 305
EP - 326
JO - Comparative Education
JF - Comparative Education
IS - 3
ER -