TY - JOUR
T1 - Round Robin Study on the Thermal Conductivity/Diffusivity of a Gold Wire with a Diameter of 30 μm Tested via Five Measurement Methods
AU - Abe, Ryo
AU - Sekimoto, Yuki
AU - Saini, Shirkant
AU - Miyazaki, Koji
AU - Li, Qinyi
AU - Li, Dawei
AU - Takahashi, Koji
AU - Yagi, Takashi
AU - Nakamura, Masakazu
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by JST CREST (Grant Nos. JPMJCR17I4, JPMJCR18I1, JPMJCR17I2, and JPMJCR18I3), and JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. JP20H02090), which were conducted as a collaboration project by four research groups in the CREST field “Creation of Innovative Core Technologies for Nano-enabled Thermal Management.”
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Science Press, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Since first establishing thermal measurement techniques for micrometer-scale wires, various methods have been devised and improved upon. However, the uncertainty of different measurements on the same sample has not yet been discussed. In this work, a round robin test was performed to compare the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity measurement methods for a fine metal wire. The tested material was a pure gold wire, with a diameter of 30 µm. The wire was cut into certain lengths and distributed to four institutions using five different measurement methods: the direct current (DC) self-heating method, the DC heating T-type method, the 3ω method for thermal conductivity, the scanning laser heating alternating current (AC) method, and the spot periodic heating radiation thermometry method for thermal diffusivity. After completing the measurements, the reported thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity at room temperature, i.e., 317 W·m−1·K−1 and 128×10−6 m2·s−1, respectively, were adopted as references for comparison with the measurement results. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are described in terms of the effect of electrical and thermal junctions fabricated on a wire, such as an electrode, a thermocouple, and a heat bath. The knowledge obtained from the tested methods will be useful for selecting and designing a measurement technique for various wire-like materials.
AB - Since first establishing thermal measurement techniques for micrometer-scale wires, various methods have been devised and improved upon. However, the uncertainty of different measurements on the same sample has not yet been discussed. In this work, a round robin test was performed to compare the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity measurement methods for a fine metal wire. The tested material was a pure gold wire, with a diameter of 30 µm. The wire was cut into certain lengths and distributed to four institutions using five different measurement methods: the direct current (DC) self-heating method, the DC heating T-type method, the 3ω method for thermal conductivity, the scanning laser heating alternating current (AC) method, and the spot periodic heating radiation thermometry method for thermal diffusivity. After completing the measurements, the reported thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity at room temperature, i.e., 317 W·m−1·K−1 and 128×10−6 m2·s−1, respectively, were adopted as references for comparison with the measurement results. The advantages and disadvantages of each method are described in terms of the effect of electrical and thermal junctions fabricated on a wire, such as an electrode, a thermocouple, and a heat bath. The knowledge obtained from the tested methods will be useful for selecting and designing a measurement technique for various wire-like materials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130738470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130738470&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11630-022-1594-9
DO - 10.1007/s11630-022-1594-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85130738470
SN - 1003-2169
VL - 31
SP - 1037
EP - 1051
JO - Journal of Thermal Science
JF - Journal of Thermal Science
IS - 4
ER -