Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments

Haruka Sogabe, Morita Yoshitsugu, Ishibashi Shinsuke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to clarify the gap in design evaluation that is thought to exist between groups of people - designers, providers (including managers) and end users - we aimed to create and put into a practical format design evaluation indicators that would make it possible for people from all perspectives to make determinations. We wondered if the same object is being evaluated, whether there are gaps in design evaluations among people who are relatively well versed in creating objects, people such as sellers and marketers who are responsible for providing society with the ultimate fruit and the people who actually use them. Therefore, we created design evaluation indicators so that people with different perspectives can evaluate designs using the same criteria and clarified the gap in design evaluations by collecting data from each group of users through the design indicators. In addition, we think that discussion of the factors that lead to the gap between user groups based on the results of the survey can provide hints at new directions for creation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Event16th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2007 - Paris, France
Duration: Jul 28 2007Jul 31 2007

Publication series

NameProceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design
VolumeDS 42

Other

Other16th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2007
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityParis
Period7/28/077/31/07

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Research on design evaluation indicators drawn from the good design award jury members' comments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this