TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between Indoor Daytime Light Exposure and Circadian Phase Response under Laboratory Free-Living Conditions
AU - Yoshimura, Michitaka
AU - Kitamura, Shingo
AU - Eto, Norihito
AU - Hida, Akiko
AU - Katsunuma, Ruri
AU - Ayabe, Naoko
AU - Motomura, Yuki
AU - Nishiwaki, Yuji
AU - Negishi, Kazuno
AU - Tsubota, Kazuo
AU - Mishima, Kazuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI [Grant Number 16H01655].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In this study, we measured the physical quantity of light (irradiance) in several wavelength bands at eye and wrist level for 8 h under laboratory conditions simulating daily life. Twenty-two healthy male participants (mean age ± SD, 29.95 ± 8.13 years) were able to move freely, and eye-level data were compared with irradiance data obtained at the wrist. We estimated circadian phase shift from the differences of DLMO before and after light exposure while considering natural drift. In addition, we investigated the influence of activities and body positions on light exposure and validated the effect of irradiance on circadian phase response. We found lower average irradiance at eye level compared with wrist level in all three RGB bands. The blue light irradiance measured at eye level was significantly correlated with circadian phase shift, possibly because the irradiance at eye level more accurately reflected its effect on the biological clock than did the measurement at the wrist. It follows that quantitative measurements of wavelength spectra at eye level are necessary to assess the effect of ambient light on the human biological clock.
AB - In this study, we measured the physical quantity of light (irradiance) in several wavelength bands at eye and wrist level for 8 h under laboratory conditions simulating daily life. Twenty-two healthy male participants (mean age ± SD, 29.95 ± 8.13 years) were able to move freely, and eye-level data were compared with irradiance data obtained at the wrist. We estimated circadian phase shift from the differences of DLMO before and after light exposure while considering natural drift. In addition, we investigated the influence of activities and body positions on light exposure and validated the effect of irradiance on circadian phase response. We found lower average irradiance at eye level compared with wrist level in all three RGB bands. The blue light irradiance measured at eye level was significantly correlated with circadian phase shift, possibly because the irradiance at eye level more accurately reflected its effect on the biological clock than did the measurement at the wrist. It follows that quantitative measurements of wavelength spectra at eye level are necessary to assess the effect of ambient light on the human biological clock.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087344358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087344358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09291016.2020.1782691
DO - 10.1080/09291016.2020.1782691
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087344358
SN - 0929-1016
VL - 53
SP - 765
EP - 785
JO - Biological Rhythm Research
JF - Biological Rhythm Research
IS - 5
ER -