Abstract
Anti-tumor responses induced by immunotherapy such as cancer vaccine are presumed to be mediated by induction of cancer-specific immune responses. Therefore, the immune-related response criteria (irRC) have been applied for cancer immunotherapies instead of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Clinical responses of 91 patients enrolled in our cancer vaccine clinical studies were evaluated using RECIST. In this study, we re-analyzed their clinical responses using irRC. We identified 2 patients whose responses were evaluated as PD by RECIST, but as PR and SD by irRC, respectively. As these 2 patients showed relatively long survival rate, we concluded that irRC was suitable for the assessment of clinical outcomes in cancer immunotherapy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1466-1468 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-analysis of cancer vaccine patients with immune-related clinical response criteria (iRRC)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS