TY - JOUR
T1 - Protein and energy utilization in germ-free and conventional chicks given diets containing different levels of dietary protein
AU - Furuse, M.
AU - Yokota, H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to Dr M. E. Coates, National Institute for Research in Dairying, England, for her critical reading of the manuscript and to Dr T. Muramatsu, Nagoya University, Japan, for help with the statistical interpretation. They also thank Dr T. Mitsuoka and Mr A. Ozaki, Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Japan, for irradiation of the experimental diets. This study was supported by a grant-in-aid (no. 00548068) for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture in Japan.
PY - 1984/3
Y1 - 1984/3
N2 - The present study was done to clarify the relationship between the amount of dietary protein given to, and the gut microflora of, the host. Day-old chicks were given diets containing three concentrations of dietary protein (50, 200 and 400 g/kg) for 14 d. Body-weight gain, food consumption, body consumption, and protein and energy utilization were measured. 2. There was no difference in body-weight gain and food consumption between germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) chicks, but food conversion efficiency (g body-weight gained/g food consumed) was significantly higher in GF than in CV chicks. 3. Little difference was found in protein retention (g protein retained/14 d), but protein retention rate (g protein retained/g protein consumed) tended to be higher in GF chicks, particularly those given the diet with the lowest protein. 4. The presence of micro-organisms improved metabolizable energy (ME) values of the diets, but not all of the digested energy in CV chicks was utilized for growth. Therefore there was little difference in energy retention (kJ energy retained/14 d) between environments, although energy retention rate (kJ energy retained/kJ ME consumed) was significantly lower in CV chicks. The amount of body fat in GF chicks was higher than that in CV chicks, especially in those fed on the low-protein diet. 5. It is suggested that although the gut microflora may have beneficial effects on the digestion of dietary energy components, they may have detrimental effects on utilization of ME by their hosts, because chicks harbouring a gut microflora seem to have higher energy requirements for maintenance.
AB - The present study was done to clarify the relationship between the amount of dietary protein given to, and the gut microflora of, the host. Day-old chicks were given diets containing three concentrations of dietary protein (50, 200 and 400 g/kg) for 14 d. Body-weight gain, food consumption, body consumption, and protein and energy utilization were measured. 2. There was no difference in body-weight gain and food consumption between germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) chicks, but food conversion efficiency (g body-weight gained/g food consumed) was significantly higher in GF than in CV chicks. 3. Little difference was found in protein retention (g protein retained/14 d), but protein retention rate (g protein retained/g protein consumed) tended to be higher in GF chicks, particularly those given the diet with the lowest protein. 4. The presence of micro-organisms improved metabolizable energy (ME) values of the diets, but not all of the digested energy in CV chicks was utilized for growth. Therefore there was little difference in energy retention (kJ energy retained/14 d) between environments, although energy retention rate (kJ energy retained/kJ ME consumed) was significantly lower in CV chicks. The amount of body fat in GF chicks was higher than that in CV chicks, especially in those fed on the low-protein diet. 5. It is suggested that although the gut microflora may have beneficial effects on the digestion of dietary energy components, they may have detrimental effects on utilization of ME by their hosts, because chicks harbouring a gut microflora seem to have higher energy requirements for maintenance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021272767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021272767&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1079/BJN19840030
DO - 10.1079/BJN19840030
M3 - Article
C2 - 6704373
AN - SCOPUS:0021272767
SN - 0007-1145
VL - 51
SP - 255
EP - 264
JO - British Journal of Nutrition
JF - British Journal of Nutrition
IS - 2
ER -