TY - JOUR
T1 - Properties of expectation biases
T2 - Optimism and overconfidence
AU - Kinari, Yusuke
N1 - Funding Information:
I am grateful to Hiroaki Kaido, Hirofumi Uchida, Hitoshi Inoue, Masayo Kani, See-Won Kim, Masahiko Shibamoto, Noah Smith, Konari Uchida, and the seminar participants at Hokkaido University, Osaka University, Kyushu University, Miyazaki Sangyo-keiei University, and Chonnam National University for their valuable comments and suggestions. I also acknowledge the research grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) #26780187 and #21730264 ) and Kyushu University (Interdisciplinary Programs in Education and Projects in Research Development) .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - This study examines the properties of expectation biases using 14 sets of panel surveys that required participants to forecast the NIKKEI 225 over three forecasting horizons: one-day, one-week, and one-month. Constructing proxies for optimism and overconfidence as the expectation biases, this study shows that participants, on average, had pessimistic beliefs for the one-day and optimistic beliefs for one-week and one-month horizons, while they had overconfident beliefs for all three horizons. It also shows that participants tended to become more optimistic and overconfident at longer horizons. Moreover, the degree of optimism or pessimism varied considerably across samples taken at different times, while overconfidence remained stable. Furthermore, this study finds a negative correlation between optimism and the return on the NIKKEI 225, demonstrating that participants became optimistic when the NIKKEI 225 decreased. A negative correlation would be expected if people formed expectations following a random walk; however, this study rejects this hypothesis.
AB - This study examines the properties of expectation biases using 14 sets of panel surveys that required participants to forecast the NIKKEI 225 over three forecasting horizons: one-day, one-week, and one-month. Constructing proxies for optimism and overconfidence as the expectation biases, this study shows that participants, on average, had pessimistic beliefs for the one-day and optimistic beliefs for one-week and one-month horizons, while they had overconfident beliefs for all three horizons. It also shows that participants tended to become more optimistic and overconfident at longer horizons. Moreover, the degree of optimism or pessimism varied considerably across samples taken at different times, while overconfidence remained stable. Furthermore, this study finds a negative correlation between optimism and the return on the NIKKEI 225, demonstrating that participants became optimistic when the NIKKEI 225 decreased. A negative correlation would be expected if people formed expectations following a random walk; however, this study rejects this hypothesis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960920652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84960920652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbef.2016.02.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jbef.2016.02.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84960920652
SN - 2214-6350
VL - 10
SP - 32
EP - 49
JO - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
JF - Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
ER -