TY - JOUR
T1 - Prior Exposure to Dynamic Visual Displays Reduces Vection Onset Latency
AU - Ni, Jing
AU - Ito, Hiroyuki
AU - Ogawa, Masaki
AU - Sunaga, Shoji
AU - Palmisano, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by KAKENHI(15H01981). Some of the results reported here have been presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (Fechner Day) held in Fukuoka, Japan, in 2017.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 by Jing Ni et al.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - While compelling illusions of self-motion (vection) can be induced purely by visual motion, they are rarely experienced immediately. This vection onset latency is thought to represent the time required to resolve sensory conflicts between the stationary observer-s visual and nonvisual information about self-motion. In this study, we investigated whether manipulations designed to increase the weightings assigned to vision (compared to the nonvisual senses) might reduce vection onset latency. We presented two different types of visual priming displays directly before our main vection-inducing displays: (1) 'random motion- priming displays - designed to pre-activate general, as opposed to self-motion-specific, visual motion processing systems; and (2) 'dynamic no-motion- priming displays - designed to stimulate vision, but not generate conscious motion perceptions. Prior exposure to both types of priming displays was found to significantly shorten vection onset latencies for the main self-motion display. These experiments show that vection onset latencies can be reduced by pre-activating the visual system with both types of priming display. Importantly, these visual priming displays did not need to be capable of inducing vection or conscious motion perception in order to produce such benefits.
AB - While compelling illusions of self-motion (vection) can be induced purely by visual motion, they are rarely experienced immediately. This vection onset latency is thought to represent the time required to resolve sensory conflicts between the stationary observer-s visual and nonvisual information about self-motion. In this study, we investigated whether manipulations designed to increase the weightings assigned to vision (compared to the nonvisual senses) might reduce vection onset latency. We presented two different types of visual priming displays directly before our main vection-inducing displays: (1) 'random motion- priming displays - designed to pre-activate general, as opposed to self-motion-specific, visual motion processing systems; and (2) 'dynamic no-motion- priming displays - designed to stimulate vision, but not generate conscious motion perceptions. Prior exposure to both types of priming displays was found to significantly shorten vection onset latencies for the main self-motion display. These experiments show that vection onset latencies can be reduced by pre-activating the visual system with both types of priming display. Importantly, these visual priming displays did not need to be capable of inducing vection or conscious motion perception in order to produce such benefits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143132665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143132665&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/22134808-bja10084
DO - 10.1163/22134808-bja10084
M3 - Article
C2 - 36731532
AN - SCOPUS:85143132665
SN - 2213-4794
VL - 35
SP - 653
EP - 676
JO - Multisensory Research
JF - Multisensory Research
IS - 7-8
ER -