TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictability of two types of El Niño assessed using an extended seasonal prediction system by MIROC
AU - Imada, Yukiko
AU - Tatebe, Hiroaki
AU - Ishii, Masayoshi
AU - Chikamoto, Yoshimitsu
AU - Mori, Masato
AU - Arai, Miki
AU - Watanabe, Masahiro
AU - Kimoto, Masahide
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Meteorological Society.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Predictability of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is examined using ensemble hindcasts made with a seasonal prediction system based on the atmosphere and ocean general circulation model, the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, version 5 (MIROC5). Particular attention is paid to differences in predictive skill in terms of the prediction error for two prominent types of El Niño: the conventional eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño and the central Pacific (CP) El Niño, the latter having a maximum warming around the date line. Although the system adopts ocean anomaly assimilation for the initialization process, it maintains a significant ability to predict ENSO with a lead time of more than half a year. This is partly due to the fact that the system is little affected by the "spring prediction barrier," because increases in the error have little dependence on the thermocline variability. Composite analyses of each type of El Niño reveal that, compared to EP El Niños, the ability to predict CP El Niños is limited and has a shorter lead time. This is because CP El Niños have relatively small amplitudes, and thus they are more affected by atmospheric noise; this prevents development of oceanic signals that can be used for prediction.
AB - Predictability of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is examined using ensemble hindcasts made with a seasonal prediction system based on the atmosphere and ocean general circulation model, the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, version 5 (MIROC5). Particular attention is paid to differences in predictive skill in terms of the prediction error for two prominent types of El Niño: the conventional eastern Pacific (EP) El Niño and the central Pacific (CP) El Niño, the latter having a maximum warming around the date line. Although the system adopts ocean anomaly assimilation for the initialization process, it maintains a significant ability to predict ENSO with a lead time of more than half a year. This is partly due to the fact that the system is little affected by the "spring prediction barrier," because increases in the error have little dependence on the thermocline variability. Composite analyses of each type of El Niño reveal that, compared to EP El Niños, the ability to predict CP El Niños is limited and has a shorter lead time. This is because CP El Niños have relatively small amplitudes, and thus they are more affected by atmospheric noise; this prevents development of oceanic signals that can be used for prediction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949749597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949749597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0007.1
DO - 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0007.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84949749597
SN - 0027-0644
VL - 143
SP - 4597
EP - 4617
JO - Monthly Weather Review
JF - Monthly Weather Review
IS - 11
ER -