TY - JOUR
T1 - Positional and directional preponderances in vection
AU - Seno, Takeharu
AU - Sato, Takao
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Gayle K. Sato for her editing of the manuscript. The Wrst author is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Sci-entiWc Research from Ministry of Education, Science and Cultures, and Ministry of Internal AVairs and Communications (SCOPE 0613034).
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - We examined the biases in vection strength caused by motion direction (temporonasal vs. nasotemporal motion) and position of stimulus presentation (nasal and temporal semi-retinas) to investigate a subcortical contribution to vection. These biases have been identified for optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and are acknowledged as evidence for a subcortical origin of OKN. In experiments, subjects monocularly observed hemi-field motion stimuli and made magnitude estimations. The results indicated significant directional and positional biases when luminance modulated gratings were used as stimuli. Vection was stronger with nasotemporal motions and nasal retina presentations, but there were no interactions between the two factors. However, these biases disappeared for second-order motion stimuli (contrast modulation), which are presumably processed by the cortex. In addition, when subjects were asked to make subjective ratings of motion impression, there was no significant difference in subjective strength between the stimuli that induced the strongest vection and weakest vection. These results, together, suggest the involvement of the subcortical pathway in vection induction.
AB - We examined the biases in vection strength caused by motion direction (temporonasal vs. nasotemporal motion) and position of stimulus presentation (nasal and temporal semi-retinas) to investigate a subcortical contribution to vection. These biases have been identified for optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and are acknowledged as evidence for a subcortical origin of OKN. In experiments, subjects monocularly observed hemi-field motion stimuli and made magnitude estimations. The results indicated significant directional and positional biases when luminance modulated gratings were used as stimuli. Vection was stronger with nasotemporal motions and nasal retina presentations, but there were no interactions between the two factors. However, these biases disappeared for second-order motion stimuli (contrast modulation), which are presumably processed by the cortex. In addition, when subjects were asked to make subjective ratings of motion impression, there was no significant difference in subjective strength between the stimuli that induced the strongest vection and weakest vection. These results, together, suggest the involvement of the subcortical pathway in vection induction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56349135791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56349135791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-008-1575-6
DO - 10.1007/s00221-008-1575-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 18818907
AN - SCOPUS:56349135791
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 192
SP - 221
EP - 229
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 2
ER -