TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II study of erlotinib plus tivantinib (ARQ 197) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer just after progression on EGFR-TKI, gefitinib or erlotinib
AU - Azuma, Koichi
AU - Hirashima, Tomonori
AU - Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
AU - Okamoto, Isamu
AU - Takahashi, Toshiaki
AU - Nishio, Makoto
AU - Hirata, Taizo
AU - Kubota, Kaoru
AU - Kasahara, Kazuo
AU - Hida, Toyoaki
AU - Yoshioka, Hiroshige
AU - Nakanishi, Kaoru
AU - Akinaga, Shiro
AU - Nishio, Kazuto
AU - Mitsudomi, Tetsuya
AU - Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Co, Ltd (Tokyo, Japan).
Publisher Copyright:
© Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited.
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - Background Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond well to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), but eventually become resistant in most cases. The hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met (HGF/c-Met) pathway is reported as a poor prognostic factor in various cancers. As c-Met is involved in EGFR-TKI resistance, a c-Met inhibitor and EGFR-TKI combination may reverse the resistance. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a c-Met selective inhibitor, tivantinib (ARQ 197), in combination with erlotinib, in Japanese EGFR mutation-positive patients with NSCLC who progressed while on EGFR-TKIs. Methods This study enrolled 45 patients with NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, who were orally administered a daily combination of tivantinib/erlotinib. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) and secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The patients underwent a mandatory second biopsy just after progression on EGFR-TKIs. The predictive biomarkers were extensively analysed using tumour and blood samples. Results The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI 1.4% to 18.3%), and the lower limit of 95% CI did not exceed the target of 5%. The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 2.7...months (95% CI 1.4 to 4.2) and 18.0...months (95% CI 13.4 to 22.2), respectively. Both were longer in c-Met high patients (c-Met high vs low: mPFS 4.1 vs 1.4...months; mOS 20.7 vs 13.9...months). Partial response was observed in three patients, all of whom were c-Met and HGF high. The common adverse events and their frequencies were similar to those known to occur with tivantinib or erlotinib alone. Conclusions Although this study did not prove clinical benefit of tivantinib in patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, activated HGF/c-Met signalling, a poor prognostic factor, may define a patient subset associated with longer survival by the tivantinib/erlotinib combination. Trial registration number NCT01580735.
AB - Background Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond well to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), but eventually become resistant in most cases. The hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met (HGF/c-Met) pathway is reported as a poor prognostic factor in various cancers. As c-Met is involved in EGFR-TKI resistance, a c-Met inhibitor and EGFR-TKI combination may reverse the resistance. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a c-Met selective inhibitor, tivantinib (ARQ 197), in combination with erlotinib, in Japanese EGFR mutation-positive patients with NSCLC who progressed while on EGFR-TKIs. Methods This study enrolled 45 patients with NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, who were orally administered a daily combination of tivantinib/erlotinib. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) and secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The patients underwent a mandatory second biopsy just after progression on EGFR-TKIs. The predictive biomarkers were extensively analysed using tumour and blood samples. Results The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI 1.4% to 18.3%), and the lower limit of 95% CI did not exceed the target of 5%. The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 2.7...months (95% CI 1.4 to 4.2) and 18.0...months (95% CI 13.4 to 22.2), respectively. Both were longer in c-Met high patients (c-Met high vs low: mPFS 4.1 vs 1.4...months; mOS 20.7 vs 13.9...months). Partial response was observed in three patients, all of whom were c-Met and HGF high. The common adverse events and their frequencies were similar to those known to occur with tivantinib or erlotinib alone. Conclusions Although this study did not prove clinical benefit of tivantinib in patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs, activated HGF/c-Met signalling, a poor prognostic factor, may define a patient subset associated with longer survival by the tivantinib/erlotinib combination. Trial registration number NCT01580735.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019581437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019581437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000063
DO - 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000063
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019581437
SN - 2059-7029
VL - 1
JO - ESMO Open
JF - ESMO Open
IS - 4
M1 - e000063
ER -