TY - JOUR
T1 - Osimertinib versus Standard of Care EGFR TKI as First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFRm Advanced NSCLC
T2 - FLAURA Asian Subset
AU - Cho, Byoung Chul
AU - Chewaskulyong, Busayamas
AU - Lee, Ki Hyeong
AU - Dechaphunkul, Arunee
AU - Sriuranpong, Virote
AU - Imamura, Fumio
AU - Nogami, Naoyuki
AU - Kurata, Takayasu
AU - Okamoto, Isamu
AU - Zhou, Caicun
AU - Cheng, Ying
AU - Cho, Eun Kyung
AU - Voon, Pei Jye
AU - Lee, Jong Seok
AU - Mann, Helen
AU - Saggese, Matilde
AU - Reungwetwattana, Thanyanan
AU - Ramalingam, Suresh S.
AU - Ohe, Yuichiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This work was supported by AstraZeneca , the manufacturer of osimertinib. Thanks to all the patients and their families. The study ( NCT02296125 ) was funded by AstraZeneca , the manufacturer of osimertinib. The authors would like to acknowledge Natalie Griffiths, PhD, from iMed Comms, Macclesfield, United Kingdom, an Ashfield Company and part of UDG Healthcare plc, for medical writing support that was funded by AstraZeneca in accordance with Good Publications Practice (GPP3) guidelines ( http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Introduction: Here we report efficacy and safety data of an Asian subset of the phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), which compares osimertinib with standard of care (SoC) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with tumors harboring exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR TKI–sensitizing mutations. Methods: Eligible Asian patients (enrolled at Asian sites) who were at least 18 years of age (≥20 years in Japan) and had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg, orally once daily) or an SoC EGFR TKI (gefitinib, 250 mg, or erlotinib, 150 mg, orally once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The key secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, central nervous system efficacy, and safety. Results: The median PFS was 16.5 versus 11.0 months for the osimertinib and SoC EGFR TKI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.41–0.72, p < 0.0001). The overall survival data were immature (24% maturity). The objective response rates were 80% for osimertinib and 75% for an SoC EGFR TKI. The median central nervous system PFS was not calculable for the osimertinib group and was 13.8 months for the SoC EGFR TKI group (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–1.17, p = 0.118). Fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher (40% versus 48%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15% versus 21%) were reported with osimertinib versus with an SoC EGFR TKI, respectively. Conclusion: In this Asian population, first-line osimertinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS over an SoC EGFR TKI, with a safety profile consistent with that for the overall FLAURA study population.
AB - Introduction: Here we report efficacy and safety data of an Asian subset of the phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), which compares osimertinib with standard of care (SoC) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with tumors harboring exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR TKI–sensitizing mutations. Methods: Eligible Asian patients (enrolled at Asian sites) who were at least 18 years of age (≥20 years in Japan) and had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg, orally once daily) or an SoC EGFR TKI (gefitinib, 250 mg, or erlotinib, 150 mg, orally once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The key secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, central nervous system efficacy, and safety. Results: The median PFS was 16.5 versus 11.0 months for the osimertinib and SoC EGFR TKI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.41–0.72, p < 0.0001). The overall survival data were immature (24% maturity). The objective response rates were 80% for osimertinib and 75% for an SoC EGFR TKI. The median central nervous system PFS was not calculable for the osimertinib group and was 13.8 months for the SoC EGFR TKI group (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.25–1.17, p = 0.118). Fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher (40% versus 48%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15% versus 21%) were reported with osimertinib versus with an SoC EGFR TKI, respectively. Conclusion: In this Asian population, first-line osimertinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS over an SoC EGFR TKI, with a safety profile consistent with that for the overall FLAURA study population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054833238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054833238&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 30240852
AN - SCOPUS:85054833238
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 14
SP - 99
EP - 106
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 1
ER -