TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal timing of surgery in infants with prenatally diagnosed isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia
T2 - a multicenter, cohort study in Japan
AU - Japanese Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group
AU - Yamoto, Masaya
AU - Ohfuji, Satoko
AU - Urushihara, Naoto
AU - Terui, Keita
AU - Nagata, Kouji
AU - Taguchi, Tomoaki
AU - Hayakawa, Masahiro
AU - Amari, Shoichiro
AU - Masumoto, Kouji
AU - Okazaki, Tadaharu
AU - Inamura, Noboru
AU - Toyoshima, Katsuaki
AU - Uchida, Keiichi
AU - Furukawa, Taizo
AU - Okawada, Manabu
AU - Yokoi, Akiko
AU - Kanamori, Yukata
AU - Usui, Noriaki
AU - Tazuke, Yuko
AU - Saka, Ryuta
AU - Okuyama, Hiroomi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Japanese Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (JP19ek0109264h0003, JP18ek0109264h0002, and JP17ek0109264h0001). Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Purpose: To date, there is no compelling evidence of the optimal timing of surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). This study aimed to establish the optimal timing of surgery in neonates with isolated left-sided CDH. Methods: This multicenter cohort study enrolled 276 patients with isolated left-sided CDH at 15 institutions. Based on the timing of surgery, the patients were classified into four groups [< 24 h (G1), 24–47 h (G2), 48–71 h (G3), and ≥ 72 h (G4)]. The clinical outcomes were compared among the groups using a logistic regression model, after adjusting for potential confounders, such as disease severity. Results: Multivariate analyses showed that G2 also had a lower mortality rate than the other groups. In mild and severe cases, there were no significant differences in mortality across the four groups. In moderate cases, G2 resulted in significantly increased survival rates, compared with G1. Conclusion: The study results suggest that surgery within 24 h of birth is not recommended for patients with moderate severity CDH, that there is no benefit in the delay of surgery for more than 72 h in mild severity CDH patients, and that there is no definite optimal time to perform surgery in severe cases of CDH.
AB - Purpose: To date, there is no compelling evidence of the optimal timing of surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). This study aimed to establish the optimal timing of surgery in neonates with isolated left-sided CDH. Methods: This multicenter cohort study enrolled 276 patients with isolated left-sided CDH at 15 institutions. Based on the timing of surgery, the patients were classified into four groups [< 24 h (G1), 24–47 h (G2), 48–71 h (G3), and ≥ 72 h (G4)]. The clinical outcomes were compared among the groups using a logistic regression model, after adjusting for potential confounders, such as disease severity. Results: Multivariate analyses showed that G2 also had a lower mortality rate than the other groups. In mild and severe cases, there were no significant differences in mortality across the four groups. In moderate cases, G2 resulted in significantly increased survival rates, compared with G1. Conclusion: The study results suggest that surgery within 24 h of birth is not recommended for patients with moderate severity CDH, that there is no benefit in the delay of surgery for more than 72 h in mild severity CDH patients, and that there is no definite optimal time to perform surgery in severe cases of CDH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092392065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092392065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00595-020-02156-7
DO - 10.1007/s00595-020-02156-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33040204
AN - SCOPUS:85092392065
SN - 0941-1291
VL - 51
SP - 880
EP - 890
JO - Surgery today
JF - Surgery today
IS - 6
ER -