TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncological outcomes of a multicenter cohort treated with axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
AU - Osawa, Takahiro
AU - Kojima, Takahiro
AU - Hara, Tomohiko
AU - Sugimoto, Mikio
AU - Eto, Masatoshi
AU - Takeuchi, Ario
AU - Minami, Keita
AU - Nakai, Yasutomo
AU - Ueda, Kosuke
AU - Ozawa, Michinobu
AU - Uemura, Motohide
AU - Miyauchi, Yasuyuki
AU - Ohba, Kojiro
AU - Suzuki, Toshiro
AU - Anai, Satoshi
AU - Shindo, Tetsuya
AU - Kusakabe, Naohisa
AU - Tamura, Keita
AU - Komiyama, Motokiyo
AU - Goto, Takayuki
AU - Yokomizo, Akira
AU - Kohei, Naoki
AU - Kashiwagi, Akira
AU - Murakami, Masaya
AU - Sazuka, Tomokazu
AU - Yasumoto, Hiroaki
AU - Iwamoto, Hideto
AU - Mitsuzuka, Koji
AU - Morooka, Daichi
AU - Shimazui, Toru
AU - Yamamoto, Yoshiaki
AU - Ikeshiro, Suguru
AU - Nakagomi, Hiroshi
AU - Morita, Ken
AU - Tomida, Ryotaro
AU - Mochizuki, Tango
AU - Inoue, Takamitsu
AU - Kitamura, Hiroshi
AU - Yamada, Shuhei
AU - Ito, Yoichi M.
AU - Murai, Sachiyo
AU - Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
AU - Shinohara, Nobuo
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to the members of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Data Center (Kenichi Miyamoto, Tomomi Mizutani, and Haruhiko Fukuda) for their helpful advice. The following investigators also participated in this study, but are not listed as co-authors: Tsukasa Igawa, Shigetaka Suekane (Department of Urology, Kurume University), Norihiko Tsuchiya (Department of Urology, Yamagata University), Hiroshi Tanaka (Department of Urology, Sapporo City General Hospital), Tsuyoshi Inoue (Department of Urology, Nara Medical University), Ataru Sazawa (Department of Urology, Obihiro Kosei Hospital), Yuto Matsushita, Hiromitsu Watanabe, Takayuki Sugiyama (Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University, School of Medicine), Koji Yoshimura (Department of Urology, Shizuoka General Hospital), Takahiro Kimura (Department of Urology, Jikei University), Akira Komiya (Department of Urology, Chiba University), Hiroaki Yamamoto (Department of Urology, Shimane University), Shuichi Morizane (Department of Urology, Tottori University), Shinichi Yamashita, Akihiro Ito (Department of Urology, Tohoku University), Atsushi Takahashi (Department of Urology, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital), Hiroaki Matsumoto (Department of Urology, Yamaguchi University), Yasukuni Matsugase (Department of Urology, Asahikawa Kosei Hospital), Manabu Kamiyama (Department of Urology, University of Yamanashi), Katsuyoshi Hashine, Shunsuke Iuchi (Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center), Naotaka Nishiyama (Department of Urology, Toyama University), Noboru Yamashita (Department of Urology, Otaru General Hospital), Toshinari Yamasaki (Department of Urology, Kyoto University), and Fumimasa Fukuta (Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo)
Funding Information:
Mikio Sugimoto has received honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Takeda. Masatoshi Eto received honoraria for lectures from Ono, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, and Chugai, and for research funding from Ono, Pfizer, Chugai, BMS, Eisai, Bayer, and MSD. Akira Yokomizo has received honoraria from Astellas. Takamitsu Inoue reports scholarship endowments from BMS. Hiroyuki Nishiyama has received honoraria from Ono and Chugai, research funds from Ono, Takeda, and Astellas, and scholarship endowments from MSD, Astellas, AstraZeneca, and Chugai. Nobuo Shinohara has received honoraria from Bayer, Ono, and Astellas, and reports institutional research funding from Ono, Takeda, Sanofi, Taiho, and Astellas. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the real-world use of axitinib and to develop a prognostic model for stratifying patients who could derive long-term benefit from axitinib. This was a retrospective, descriptive study evaluating the efficacy of axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that had been treated with 1 or 2 systemic antiangiogenic therapy regimens at 1 of 36 hospitals belonging to the Japan Urologic Oncology Group between January 2012 and February 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Using a split-sample method, candidate variables that exhibited significant relationships with OS were chosen to create a model. The new model was validated using the rest of the cohort. In total, 485 patients were enrolled. The median OS was 34 months in the entire study population, whereas it was not reached, 27 months, and 14 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the new risk classification model. The following 4 variables were included in the final risk model: the disease stage at diagnosis, number of metastatic sites at the start of axitinib therapy, serum albumin level, and neutrophil : lymphocyte ratio. The adjusted area under the curve values of the new model at 12, 36, and 60 months were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively. The efficacy of axitinib in routine practice is comparable or even superior to that reported previously. The patients in the new model’s favorable risk group might derive a long-term survival benefit from axitinib treatment.
AB - The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the real-world use of axitinib and to develop a prognostic model for stratifying patients who could derive long-term benefit from axitinib. This was a retrospective, descriptive study evaluating the efficacy of axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that had been treated with 1 or 2 systemic antiangiogenic therapy regimens at 1 of 36 hospitals belonging to the Japan Urologic Oncology Group between January 2012 and February 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Using a split-sample method, candidate variables that exhibited significant relationships with OS were chosen to create a model. The new model was validated using the rest of the cohort. In total, 485 patients were enrolled. The median OS was 34 months in the entire study population, whereas it was not reached, 27 months, and 14 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the new risk classification model. The following 4 variables were included in the final risk model: the disease stage at diagnosis, number of metastatic sites at the start of axitinib therapy, serum albumin level, and neutrophil : lymphocyte ratio. The adjusted area under the curve values of the new model at 12, 36, and 60 months were 0.77, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively. The efficacy of axitinib in routine practice is comparable or even superior to that reported previously. The patients in the new model’s favorable risk group might derive a long-term survival benefit from axitinib treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086327041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086327041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cas.14449
DO - 10.1111/cas.14449
M3 - Article
C2 - 32402135
AN - SCOPUS:85086327041
SN - 1347-9032
VL - 111
SP - 2460
EP - 2471
JO - Cancer Science
JF - Cancer Science
IS - 7
ER -