TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical modeling of the global ionospheric effects of storm sequence on September 9-14, 2005 - Comparison with IRI model
AU - Klimenko, M. V.
AU - Klimenko, V. V.
AU - Ratovsky, K. G.
AU - Goncharenko, L. P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments. The authors acknowledge the Irkutsk and Yakutsk digisonde teams and Arecibo and Millstone Hill ISR teams for processing the data and making the experimental data available. We express our gratitude to Prof. Bodo Reinisch for his help in evaluating this paper. These investigations were carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR)—Grant No. 08-05-00274.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This study presents the modeling of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of September 9-14, 2005. We examine the performance of the Global Self-Consistent Model of Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) and International Reference Ionosphere-2000 (IRI-2000), and compare the modeling predictions with the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar observations over Yakutsk, Irkutsk, Millstone Hill and Arecibo stations. IRI-2000 predicted well all negative f0F2 disturbances. In comparison with IRI-2000, the GSM TIP better reproduced the positive phase observed during the disturbed times. We discuss the possible reasons of the differences between the GSM TIP model calculations, IRI predictions, and the observations.
AB - This study presents the modeling of ionospheric response to geomagnetic storms of September 9-14, 2005. We examine the performance of the Global Self-Consistent Model of Thermosphere, Ionosphere and Protonosphere (GSM TIP) and International Reference Ionosphere-2000 (IRI-2000), and compare the modeling predictions with the ionosonde and incoherent scatter radar observations over Yakutsk, Irkutsk, Millstone Hill and Arecibo stations. IRI-2000 predicted well all negative f0F2 disturbances. In comparison with IRI-2000, the GSM TIP better reproduced the positive phase observed during the disturbed times. We discuss the possible reasons of the differences between the GSM TIP model calculations, IRI predictions, and the observations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876400373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876400373&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5047/eps.2011.06.048
DO - 10.5047/eps.2011.06.048
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84876400373
SN - 1343-8832
VL - 64
SP - 433
EP - 440
JO - earth, planets and space
JF - earth, planets and space
IS - 6
ER -