TY - GEN
T1 - Multiple-attribute decision making with estimation of preferences of multiple evaluators
AU - Murata, Junichi
AU - Saruwatari, Masato
AU - Hashikawa, Satoshi
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - A method is proposed to solve a class of multiple-attribute decision making problems where the alternatives are evaluated by two or more evaluators different from the decision maker. In multiple-attribute decision making, the decision maker must find the best one among a set of Pareto optimal solutions. Usually, this is done based on the preference of the decision maker. However, in the problems treated here, the alternatives are evaluated not by the decision maker but by other people. For example, in public services, the service provider is the decision maker who is to choose and provide the high-quality services, while the quality of services is evaluated by the clients. Hardly any of the existing methods addresses this type of problems. This paper proposes an interactive method for estimation of multiple evaluators' preferences, their reasonable unification and finding the best solution. An example illustrates the validity and efficiency of the proposed method.
AB - A method is proposed to solve a class of multiple-attribute decision making problems where the alternatives are evaluated by two or more evaluators different from the decision maker. In multiple-attribute decision making, the decision maker must find the best one among a set of Pareto optimal solutions. Usually, this is done based on the preference of the decision maker. However, in the problems treated here, the alternatives are evaluated not by the decision maker but by other people. For example, in public services, the service provider is the decision maker who is to choose and provide the high-quality services, while the quality of services is evaluated by the clients. Hardly any of the existing methods addresses this type of problems. This paper proposes an interactive method for estimation of multiple evaluators' preferences, their reasonable unification and finding the best solution. An example illustrates the validity and efficiency of the proposed method.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649278210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649278210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78649278210
SN - 9784907764364
T3 - Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference
SP - 1466
EP - 1471
BT - Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference 2010, SICE 2010 - Final Program and Papers
PB - Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE)
ER -