TY - JOUR
T1 - Metastasis to the gluteus maximus muscle from renal cell carcinoma with special emphasis on MRI features
AU - Sakamoto, Akio
AU - Yoshida, Tatsuya
AU - Matsuura, Suguru
AU - Tanaka, Kazuhiro
AU - Matsuda, Shuichi
AU - Oda, Yoshinao
AU - Hori, Yoshifumi
AU - Yokomizo, Akira
AU - Iwamoto, Yukihide
PY - 2007/8/4
Y1 - 2007/8/4
N2 - Background: The skeletal muscle is an unusual site for metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Metastatic RCC must be differentiated from benign primary soft-tissue tumors because aggressive surgical resection is necessary. Case presentation: We present the case of a 65-year-old man with metastatic RCC in the gluteus maximus muscle (3.8 cm in diameter) found on enhanced computed tomography (CT) 6 years after nephrectomy. Retrospectively, the small mass (1 cm in diameter) was overlooked 5 years earlier on enhanced CT. Because the growth of the lesion was slow, benign tumor was a differential diagnosis. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed that the mass had high-signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images (WIs) compared to that of skeletal muscle, with mild enhancement by Gadolinium. The MRI features were unusual for most soft-tissue tumors having low-signal intensity on T1-WI and high-signal intensity on T2-WI. Therefore, under a diagnosis of metastatic RCC, the lesion was resected together with the surrounding skeletal muscle. The histology was confirmed to be metastatic RCC. Conclusion: MRI features of metastatic RCC may be beneficial in differentiating it from primary soft-tissue tumor.
AB - Background: The skeletal muscle is an unusual site for metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Metastatic RCC must be differentiated from benign primary soft-tissue tumors because aggressive surgical resection is necessary. Case presentation: We present the case of a 65-year-old man with metastatic RCC in the gluteus maximus muscle (3.8 cm in diameter) found on enhanced computed tomography (CT) 6 years after nephrectomy. Retrospectively, the small mass (1 cm in diameter) was overlooked 5 years earlier on enhanced CT. Because the growth of the lesion was slow, benign tumor was a differential diagnosis. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed that the mass had high-signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images (WIs) compared to that of skeletal muscle, with mild enhancement by Gadolinium. The MRI features were unusual for most soft-tissue tumors having low-signal intensity on T1-WI and high-signal intensity on T2-WI. Therefore, under a diagnosis of metastatic RCC, the lesion was resected together with the surrounding skeletal muscle. The histology was confirmed to be metastatic RCC. Conclusion: MRI features of metastatic RCC may be beneficial in differentiating it from primary soft-tissue tumor.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548733750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548733750&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1477-7819-5-88
DO - 10.1186/1477-7819-5-88
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34548733750
SN - 1477-7819
VL - 5
JO - World Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - World Journal of Surgical Oncology
M1 - 88
ER -