TY - GEN
T1 - Memory distortion of depth of a visual stimulus for perception and action
AU - Tanaka, Kanji
AU - Yamamoto, Kentaro
AU - Sung-En, Chien
AU - Watanabe, Katsumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/3/23
Y1 - 2016/3/23
N2 - It has been known remembered locations of visual stimuli are systematically distorted in a two-dimensional (i.e., retinal) coordinate, which includes the foveal bias, memory averaging, and landmark effect. The present study aimed at examining how the remembered depth position of a visual target would be distorted. Also, we examined whether depth distortion would differ for perceptual and motor-related tasks. In the experiments, a visual target was presented for one second at various distances from the observers by using a 3D projector. The fixation distance was also varied. After the disappearance of the target, observers performed either perceptual judgment (the method of constant to estimate the point of psychological subjective equality) or motor response (by using a 3D mouse) for the remembered target distance. The results showed that the remembered depth of the target was compressed toward the averaged depth of the possible depth range for both perceptual and motor responses. In addition, however, the perceptual responses tended to overestimate the depth when the fixation depth was closer than or the same as the nearest possible depth of the target. No bias was observed when the fixation depth was farther than the nearest possible depth. For the motor responses, there was a general underestimation irrespective of fixation depth. These results suggest that spatial memory of depth for visual stimuli may be qualitatively different between perceptual and motor responses.
AB - It has been known remembered locations of visual stimuli are systematically distorted in a two-dimensional (i.e., retinal) coordinate, which includes the foveal bias, memory averaging, and landmark effect. The present study aimed at examining how the remembered depth position of a visual target would be distorted. Also, we examined whether depth distortion would differ for perceptual and motor-related tasks. In the experiments, a visual target was presented for one second at various distances from the observers by using a 3D projector. The fixation distance was also varied. After the disappearance of the target, observers performed either perceptual judgment (the method of constant to estimate the point of psychological subjective equality) or motor response (by using a 3D mouse) for the remembered target distance. The results showed that the remembered depth of the target was compressed toward the averaged depth of the possible depth range for both perceptual and motor responses. In addition, however, the perceptual responses tended to overestimate the depth when the fixation depth was closer than or the same as the nearest possible depth of the target. No bias was observed when the fixation depth was farther than the nearest possible depth. For the motor responses, there was a general underestimation irrespective of fixation depth. These results suggest that spatial memory of depth for visual stimuli may be qualitatively different between perceptual and motor responses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966616946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966616946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/KST.2016.7440511
DO - 10.1109/KST.2016.7440511
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84966616946
T3 - 2016 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology, KST 2016
SP - 281
EP - 286
BT - 2016 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology, KST 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Smart Technology, KST 2016
Y2 - 3 February 2016 through 6 February 2016
ER -