TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanistic critical heat flux prediction for in-vessel retention conditions
AU - Akand, Md Abdur Rafiq
AU - Matsumoto, Tatsuya
AU - Liu, Wei
AU - Morita, Koji
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors are grateful to Mr. Kei Kitahara, Department of Applied Quantum Physics & Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu University for the support to carry out the experiments. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - In-vessel retention (IVR) is considered a feasible technique to keep reactor pressure vessel (RPV) integrity in a severe reactor accident. For light water reactor (LWR), the effectiveness of this strategy relies soundly on the critical heat flux (CHF) distribution over the external surface of the lower plenum of RPV, whose orientation varies gradually from downward-facing horizontal to vertical. The CHF prediction capability of the liquid sublayer dryout model is efficient for high mass flux in vertical flow boiling conditions. This paper focuses on how to adapt the model to the changed orientation of the heating surface. Bubble departure diameter (dB) and net vapor generation point (NVG), the starting point for the void fraction developing in a heating channel, is one of the important key points in the CHF prediction. Therefore, to assess the predictive potential of CHF under IVR, experimental research was performed to measure bubble departure diameter and NVG for a changing heating surface orientation from downward-facing horizontal to vertical with a mechanistic model basing on the force balance. A modified liquid sublayer dryout model was then proposed where the channel orientation effect is considered to measure the bubble departure diameter (vapor blanket diameter) using the improved force balance model. The NVG is modified according to the departure diameter. The predicted departure diameter and subcooling at NVG show good consistency with the experimental data, and the modified liquid sublayer dryout model can predict the CHF data with an average relative error of 18.36% in IVR.
AB - In-vessel retention (IVR) is considered a feasible technique to keep reactor pressure vessel (RPV) integrity in a severe reactor accident. For light water reactor (LWR), the effectiveness of this strategy relies soundly on the critical heat flux (CHF) distribution over the external surface of the lower plenum of RPV, whose orientation varies gradually from downward-facing horizontal to vertical. The CHF prediction capability of the liquid sublayer dryout model is efficient for high mass flux in vertical flow boiling conditions. This paper focuses on how to adapt the model to the changed orientation of the heating surface. Bubble departure diameter (dB) and net vapor generation point (NVG), the starting point for the void fraction developing in a heating channel, is one of the important key points in the CHF prediction. Therefore, to assess the predictive potential of CHF under IVR, experimental research was performed to measure bubble departure diameter and NVG for a changing heating surface orientation from downward-facing horizontal to vertical with a mechanistic model basing on the force balance. A modified liquid sublayer dryout model was then proposed where the channel orientation effect is considered to measure the bubble departure diameter (vapor blanket diameter) using the improved force balance model. The NVG is modified according to the departure diameter. The predicted departure diameter and subcooling at NVG show good consistency with the experimental data, and the modified liquid sublayer dryout model can predict the CHF data with an average relative error of 18.36% in IVR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116868135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116868135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111494
DO - 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111494
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85116868135
SN - 0029-5493
VL - 384
JO - Nuclear Engineering and Design
JF - Nuclear Engineering and Design
M1 - 111494
ER -