Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for read-once decision trees with parity nodes

Hideaki Fukuhara, Eiji Takimoto

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

We introduce a complexity measure for decision trees called the soft rank, which measures how wellbalanced a given tree is. The soft rank is a somehow relaxed variant of the rank. Among all decision trees of depth d, the complete binary decision tree (the most balanced tree) has maximum soft rank √d, the decision list (the most unbalanced tree) has minimum soft rank √d, and any other trees have soft rank between d and d. We show that, for any decision tree T in some class G of decision trees which includes all read-once decision trees, the soft rank of T is a lower bound on the quantum query complexity of the Boolean function that T represents. This implies that for any Boolean function f that is represented by a decision tree in G, the deterministic query complexity of f is only quadratically larger than the quantum query complexity of f.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheory of Computing 2009 - Proceedings of the Fifteenth Computing
Subtitle of host publicationThe Australasian Theory Symposium, CATS 2009
Publication statusPublished - 2009
EventTheory of Computing 2009 - 15th Computing: The Australasian Theory Symposium, CATS 2009 - Wellington, New Zealand
Duration: Jan 20 2009Jan 23 2009

Publication series

NameConferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series
Volume94
ISSN (Print)1445-1336

Other

OtherTheory of Computing 2009 - 15th Computing: The Australasian Theory Symposium, CATS 2009
Country/TerritoryNew Zealand
CityWellington
Period1/20/091/23/09

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems
  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lower bounds on quantum query complexity for read-once decision trees with parity nodes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this