TY - JOUR
T1 - Left ventricular performance in aortic valve replacement
AU - Tanoue, Yoshihisa
AU - Maeda, Taketoshi
AU - Oda, Shinichiro
AU - Baba, Hironori
AU - Oishi, Yasuhisa
AU - Tokunaga, Shigehiko
AU - Nakashima, Atsuhiro
AU - Tominaga, Ryuji
PY - 2009/8/1
Y1 - 2009/8/1
N2 - We analyzed the mid-term left ventricular (LV) performance after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We measured LV contractility (endsystolic elastance: Ees), afterload (effective arterial elastance: Ea) and efficiency (ventriculoarterial coupling: Ea/Ees; ratio of stroke work and pressure-volume area: SW/PVA) based on transthoracic echocardiography data obtained before, after and approximately 1 year after isolated AVR in 263 patients with aortic stenosis (AS group; n=116), aortic regurgitation (AR group; n=93) or aortic stenosis and regurgitation (ASR group; n=54). The LV volume was calculated by the Teichholz M-mode method. Ees and Ea were approximated as follows: Eessmean blood pressure/minimal LV volume; Ea=systolic blood pressure/(maximal LV volume-minimal LV volume). Thereafter, Ea/Ees and SW/PVA were calculated. Arterial blood pressure was measured using manchette methods. Ees and Ea decreased after AVR inthe AS group, but increased in the AR group. Ea/Ees and SW/PVA worsened after AVR in the AR group, but improved during a 1-year period after AVR in all groups. Contrasting effects of AVR on LV contractility and afterload between AS and AR were clearly demonstrated. The mid-term LV contractility and efficiency after AVR were excellent and satisfactory. However, LV efficiency worsened early after AVR in AR patients.
AB - We analyzed the mid-term left ventricular (LV) performance after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We measured LV contractility (endsystolic elastance: Ees), afterload (effective arterial elastance: Ea) and efficiency (ventriculoarterial coupling: Ea/Ees; ratio of stroke work and pressure-volume area: SW/PVA) based on transthoracic echocardiography data obtained before, after and approximately 1 year after isolated AVR in 263 patients with aortic stenosis (AS group; n=116), aortic regurgitation (AR group; n=93) or aortic stenosis and regurgitation (ASR group; n=54). The LV volume was calculated by the Teichholz M-mode method. Ees and Ea were approximated as follows: Eessmean blood pressure/minimal LV volume; Ea=systolic blood pressure/(maximal LV volume-minimal LV volume). Thereafter, Ea/Ees and SW/PVA were calculated. Arterial blood pressure was measured using manchette methods. Ees and Ea decreased after AVR inthe AS group, but increased in the AR group. Ea/Ees and SW/PVA worsened after AVR in the AR group, but improved during a 1-year period after AVR in all groups. Contrasting effects of AVR on LV contractility and afterload between AS and AR were clearly demonstrated. The mid-term LV contractility and efficiency after AVR were excellent and satisfactory. However, LV efficiency worsened early after AVR in AR patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68049113469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68049113469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1510/icvts.2009.202309
DO - 10.1510/icvts.2009.202309
M3 - Article
C2 - 19443490
AN - SCOPUS:68049113469
SN - 1569-9293
VL - 9
SP - 255
EP - 259
JO - Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
JF - Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
IS - 2
ER -