TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic liver resection in cirrhotic patients with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system
AU - Uchida, Hiroki
AU - Iwashita, Yukio
AU - Tada, Kazuhiro
AU - Saga, Kunihiro
AU - Takayama, Hiroomi
AU - Hirashita, Teijiro
AU - Endo, Yuichi
AU - Ohta, Masayuki
AU - Inomata, Masafumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is widely used for liver tumors, but its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. Methods: From January 2010 to March 2016, the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify differences between the liver cirrhosis and non-liver cirrhosis groups; these groups were further stratified to high and low difficulty scores. The surgical outcomes of both groups were compared according to the difficulty scores. Results: Overall, 53/95 (55.8%) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity between groups, although liver function was worse in the liver cirrhosis group than in the non-liver cirrhosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of increased blood loss. In particular, blood loss in cirrhotic patients was significantly greater with a high difficulty score than with a low difficulty score. Conclusions: The safety profile of laparoscopic liver resection was the same in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. However, patients with liver cirrhosis and a high difficulty score require extra attention, because of a higher risk for perioperative blood loss.
AB - Purpose: Laparoscopic liver resection is widely used for liver tumors, but its utility in patients with cirrhosis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in patients with liver cirrhosis with specific reference to a difficulty scoring system. Methods: From January 2010 to March 2016, the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in 95 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical outcomes were analyzed to identify differences between the liver cirrhosis and non-liver cirrhosis groups; these groups were further stratified to high and low difficulty scores. The surgical outcomes of both groups were compared according to the difficulty scores. Results: Overall, 53/95 (55.8%) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in surgical duration, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity between groups, although liver function was worse in the liver cirrhosis group than in the non-liver cirrhosis group. Multivariate analysis showed that the difficulty score was an independent predictor of increased blood loss. In particular, blood loss in cirrhotic patients was significantly greater with a high difficulty score than with a low difficulty score. Conclusions: The safety profile of laparoscopic liver resection was the same in patients with and without liver cirrhosis. However, patients with liver cirrhosis and a high difficulty score require extra attention, because of a higher risk for perioperative blood loss.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044950829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044950829&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4
DO - 10.1007/s00423-018-1671-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 29619626
AN - SCOPUS:85044950829
SN - 1435-2443
VL - 403
SP - 371
EP - 377
JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -