TY - JOUR
T1 - Japanese structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012
AU - Numasaki, Hodaka
AU - Teshima, Teruki
AU - Ando, Yutaka
AU - Akuta, Keizo
AU - Ikeda, Hiroshi
AU - Okajima, Kaoru
AU - Kumano, Tomoyasu
AU - Sasaki, Tomonari
AU - Sekiguchi, Kenji
AU - Tago, Masao
AU - Terahara, Atsuro
AU - Nakamura, Katsumasa
AU - Nishimura, Tetsuo
AU - Ogawa, Kazuhiko
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the JASTRO and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. JP17K10475].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
PY - 2019/12/10
Y1 - 2019/12/10
N2 - This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), 60Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and 192Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012.
AB - This paper describes the ongoing structure of radiation oncology in Japan in terms of equipment, personnel, patient load and geographic distribution to identify and overcome any existing limitations. From March 2013 to August 2016, the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology conducted a questionnaire based on the Japanese national structure survey of radiation oncology in 2012. Data were analyzed based on the institutional stratification by the annual number of new patients treated with radiotherapy per institution. The estimated annual numbers of new and total (new plus repeat) patients treated with radiation were 213 000 and 251 000, respectively. Additionally, the estimated cancer incidence was 865 238 cases with ~24.6% of all newly diagnosed patients being treated with radiation. The types and numbers of treatment devices actually used included linear accelerator (LINAC; n = 864), telecobalt (n = 0), Gamma Knife (n = 44), 60Co remote afterloading system (RALS; n = 23) and 192Ir RALS (n = 130). The LINAC system used dual-energy functions in 651 units, 3D conformal radiotherapy functions in 759 and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) functions in 466. There were 792 Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology-certified radiation oncologists, 1061.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) radiation oncologists, 2124.2 FTE radiotherapy technologists, 181.3 FTE medical physicists, 170.9 FTE radiotherapy quality managers and 841.5 FTE nurses. The frequency of IMRT use significantly increased during this time. In conclusion, the Japanese structure of radiation oncology has clearly improved in terms of equipment and utility although there was a shortage of personnel in 2012.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078550014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078550014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jrr/rrz077
DO - 10.1093/jrr/rrz077
M3 - Article
C2 - 31825076
AN - SCOPUS:85078550014
SN - 0449-3060
VL - 61
SP - 146
EP - 160
JO - Journal of radiation research
JF - Journal of radiation research
IS - 1
ER -